Why subjectivity matters, a note on the importance of qualification

on Sunday, December 9, 2012

It is okay to have biases, just as long as we are aware they exist. Opinions are valuable contributions, but they must be preceded by qualifications. We must know from which context the opinion is coming. Omniscience is not a realistic human quality. Nobody writes with the absolute truth at his or her back. Further, outside information is important for content, but it only stretches to the margins of its source, or the reference points of its reader.

We all need to do a better job of qualifying ourselves. Age, upbringing, ideology, the certain magazines or websites we read, or even our daily preferences all impact the words and ideas we report, or how we respond.

For me, I’m 23 years old. I live in a humble neighborhood in Washington D.C. I vote Democratic. I listen to Radiohead everyday. I follow sports closely, especially the NBA and American football. I have a conviction that human beings all possess equal abilities, irregardless of everything. I’ve lived in every part of the U.S., and I have friends of every type. I also think it reflects cowardice to comment alone, without putting forth articles. Which returns us to subjectivity.

Not in all instances is subjectivity beneficial. Sometimes, it is best for information to be presented cleanly. Of course, this is not how we most often receive it. Although there are no grand conspiracies to deliver slanted news coverage, it does get delivered that way for numerous reasons, most of them incidental. But, in editorial writing, opinions are foundational.

Editorializing says that it is impossible to make a truly objective statement, so we should instead put forward our opinions, with candor. But, the first rule of editorializing is that the author must qualify him or herself. This way an article is presented and interpreted in a suitable context.

Okay, I get it. You don’t want to disclose too much for fear of muqaburat. But, if we don’t have even a general outline of qualifications, meaning region, background, biases, then the authority of the information will always be in question.

Those of us with courage enough to write for public view deserve better than skepticism or indifference. We should be read. And criticized, appropriately. Given our diverse backgrounds, though, it is imperative that our readership knows who we are. Without qualification, they’re just empty words.



View the
Original article

0 comments: