Hiking in the Rocky Mountains in the state of Montana with my wife and her two sisters, all of whom are from Saudi Arabia, I decided to bring up an interesting topic for discussion. My wife is exposed to new ideas and new types of people everyday, and so she is open-minded toward many subjects. Her sister is more traditional, in the sense that her cultural inclinations are influenced more by Saudi Arabia than America. Often when I discuss an idea that I have with my wife, she listens calmly, and either agrees or disagrees, but seldom does she get mad. Her sister, though, gets mad.
At this time, the American Football season was about to start. Because of labor disputes between the NFL and the referees, it had been decided that replacement officials would work the games until the labor dispute was resolved. Now, no sport is more significant to Americans than American Football, especially the NFL. Numerous radio and television stations are devoted only to sports, and NFL football consumes the bulk of the attention. So, the big argument across the country at this time was why the players in the NFL, who are the best in the country, should have to play with replacement referees. What were the qualifications of these referees? What experience did they have? How would they affect the integrity of the game? Believe me, this subject caused many excited debates throughout the country for several months.
So, liking to pose controversial questions for the sake of starting intelligent and impassioned debates, I turned to my wife’s sister and said, “isn’t it interesting that in America, for a game, the credentials and qualifications of a few replacement referees causes such concern. Every single detail of these referees’ qualifications and past experiences has been searched out, and discussed and debated publicly for months. But, in the Middle East, there are religious scholars, most of whom have never left their country, or even their home region, but you listen to them and follow their words and ideas. What are their qualifications for speaking about the World when they have never even visited the West, or seen first-hand many of the topics about which they deliver such firm rulings. And what makes their interpretation of Islam legitimate? Who are they to say Islam is this or Islam is that? Can’t you read from the Qur’an yourself, and make up your own ideas? In America, we have replacement officials for a football game, and their qualifications are fervently debated for months before the first game has even started. But in the Middle East, you have religious scholars who you listen to, but about whom you never question their rulings or their qualifications. Why?”
Expectedly, her sister got mad at me. But then my wife stood up and said to her sister, “look, just because something exists doesn’t mean we need to defend it. Sometimes the truth is what it is, and it isn’t always right.”
The purpose of this website and blog, as I see it, is to initiate complicated dialogues in order to better understand each other’s worldviews. The purpose is not to prove that you’re smarter or more right than anyone else. Talk about what you believe, while accepting what someone else believes. But do it without insulting or denigrating anybody with a different viewpoint.
So, without getting mad, what is your opinion about the question I raised to my wife and her sister? Do you find it offensive, truthful, or both? There is no right or wrong answer. But what your answer will do is help fulfill the purpose of this blog, which is to introduce different worldviews, while always remembering that none of us is right or wrong. We just are who we are.
View the Original article
0 comments:
Post a Comment