Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts
Showing posts with label violence. Show all posts

The rise of Prejudice and Violence against Muslims

on Wednesday, April 17, 2013

The acts of violence and persecution against the Muslims had been initiated soon after the 9/11 attacks. Although still it has never been proved that only Muslims were involved in those attacks, still most of the American population holds quite negative views about them. The one thing, that is visible in all this, is the use of principle of hasty generalization.

In other words, it is never logical and rational to tag a complete religion as being the mother of terrorists, because only 1 % of the followers of that religion engage in acts of violence and terrorism. Apart from this, the acts driven by violence are still visible in one form or the other. Moreover, the acts had also continued in the year 2007 and 2008. The most serious forms of these offenses include a number of physical and mental assaults, which are most of the times quite deadly. These assaults have been directed not only to the ordinary Muslims, but also towards the Muslim leaders.

Moreover, there is no end to the arrests that have been made in the name of terrorism. In reality, the only reason for these arrests have been the individual’s involvement in the religion of Islam. In more simple words, being a Muslim became their crime, in a similar manner that the African Americans were tagged to be criminals not so long ago.

The complexity of the prejudice against Muslims is also intensified by a number of dimensions of discrimination which can be seen in various incidents all over the United States. In addition, these acts of violence show an overlay of various forms of intolerance which are, most of the times, based on the victim’s religion and ethnicity. Unfortunately, not only men who face such violance, but also women and children have been subject to these mental and physical assaults that are being carried against them. The most visible sign of violence and discrimination, against the women in Islam, is the verbal abuse through which the women who make use of Hijab have to go through. Surely, some of the law enforcement agencies have responded to these rising issues, but still they seem to have failed in exercising a control over this hatred which seems to be growing with every second that passes us by.

Another prime problem here is underreporting, as most of the victims are threatened for not going to the police. Now in regrad to these assaults which are being carried out in the domain of the country which considers itself to be the leader and founder of secularism and peace, isn’t it all a form of terrorism. For those who do not know about the exact definition, let me tell you that terrorism does not only involves the use of weapons of mass destruction, but it also encapsulates the use of physical and verbal violence that is intended to harm the other person in any manner possible. Knowing this fact, who is the real terrorist?



View the
Original article

Muslim Buddhist Violence in Burma

on Sunday, March 31, 2013

Destroyed buildings in the Burmese city of Meikhtila present a sorrowful picture that the world has constantly and cruelly overlooked for quite a long time. Buddhists that are commonly perceived as advocates of peace and tranquility have certainly been showing a surprisingly extremist behavior. The streets of Burma show an array of blood spills and dismantled buildings, a sight unbearable to any humanitarian no matter what school of thought he or she follows.

Only recently a UN envoy to the country pleaded for peace, though I would personally call for substantial international involvement such that the matter can be taken care of once and for all. Mr. Thein Sein, Burmese President had declared a state of emergency in the country, calling for the army to jump in after the recent attack on Muslim Centers that resulted in the entire building being torched. More events of the same nature were reported from other cities on the south as well where Buddhists burnt down a Mosque and fifty homes in Yamethin (64kms from Meikhtila) this Saturday. In other events, several buildings and yet another Mosque was set ablaze in Lewei a city that lies on the southern side of Burmese capital Naypytaw.

It is nothing but outrageous cruelty at the hands of the international community for not even blinking an eye at a mayhem that has caused more than 10000 human beings to be displaced, and hundreds killed for a reason that is purely and utterly racist.

The Interfaith Friendship Organization (IFO) an organization built for the sole purpose of building unity between Buddhist, Christian, Hindu and Muslims has expressed sorrow at the events and asked the Buddhists monks to help ease the situation. Furthermore, their official statement goes as under:

“We would like to call upon the government to provide sufficient security and to protect the displaced people and to investigate and take legal measures as urgently as possible”

The initial rampage began with a mere quarrel between a Muslim shopkeeper and his Buddhist customer. Reports spread that apparently the Muslim shop owner had killed the Buddhist and as a result, numbers of Buddhist mobs attacked a Muslim neighborhood destroying countless residential buildings as well as religious ones.

The ensuing instability is of dire tension as the country has barely risen from a half a century old army rule. Thein Sein government faces a major issue now, and it is upon the few retired army men who have taken up the charge to work day in day out to stabilize the situation that is showing signs of further troubles. This has been the third incident of its kind in the past three years with a minimum of six mosques being burnt down.



View the
Original article

France to ban website documenting police violence against Muslims

on Thursday, March 7, 2013

Alleging defamation, France's interior minister Manuel Valls is trying to shut down a website which gives a voice to the victims of police harassment. The site has become especially popular with France's Muslim population, who often claim that police target, harass and even kill them with impunity.

Statistics prove that non-whites justifiably feel under attack: Researchers say that Arabs and black Muslims compose up to 70 percent of France's prisoners.

For years groups such as Amnesty International and the UN Human Rights Committee have testified to racist practices among the French police, but many say nothing has changed. Allegations of abuse are routinely dismissed as the French police are supported by their unions, far-right political groups and now the Socialist administration.

Amal Bentounsi started the website last year, after her brother was reportedly shot in the back by a policeman. The case is ongoing, but she says her site provides a voice for the many victims whose experiences are never heard in a courtroom.

While agreeing that government action is needed, Bentounsi believes it's the French media which needs the most urgent reform. She says they need to acknowledge their role in legitimizing the Islamophobia which has especially stigmatized young Muslim males.

Many Muslims say that French society has two sets of rules: One for the police, and another for regular citizens; one form of justice for whites, and another for Muslims and immigrants. For those who are 2nd and even 3rd generation French citizens, such inequalities are especially dispiriting.

Press TV, 6 March 2013



View the Original article

CHRISTIANITY–PEACE OR VIOLENCE

on Sunday, March 3, 2013

It is only fair that in order to form opinions on an important matter; one should weigh both its past and its present. Logical minds can only be justified with facts and figures; matters of history, words of the book. The beliefs about the world’s most populous religion’s peacefulness or violence are a matter of great concern, for not only the near 5 billion non-Christians but to the 2 billion Christians, too.

If we want to decide where Christianity stands between peace and violence, we must first go back to its core; the history and Bible. The history of Christianity is not just black or white on certain issues. One such issue is what we have at hand. Critics and advocates of religion have gone back and forth on this debate innumerable times heeding nothing, but we still have some facts straightened up for us.

According to the popular belief, Jesus Christ sacrificed himself for the sins of his people. He bought forgiveness for them. The Messiah and his acts towards his populace never showed the slightest signs of aggressiveness –in fact, the kindness Jesus was extended to the non believers too! How a religion with such a Prophet can be violent or aggressive in nature, we ask ourselves.

Looking at the Old Testament and the New Testament, we find certain matters that create excitement if not confusion, Critics are of the opinion that both the Old & New Testament do not go in line with each other. For instance, the Old Testament refers to events that would be more violent than the ever famous Holocaust itself. An example would be where God, in order to keep believers separated from non believers, orders complete cities to be slaughtered at the point of the sword or where the principle of “an eye for an eye” is advocated. These and many such matters are non-existent in the New Testament, making it more on the lines of peace and love.

Moving on, we now look at what practices are being followed by the mainstream Christians. Though virtually every Church spreads the word of God, striking out hatred and calling for peace, but still were not there instances when clinics were burnt for they facilitated abortions (something out rightly against Christian teachings). Looking at matters of today, we do see the advocacy of freedom of speech in the Christian world but the tolerance and peacefulness towards people of other faiths is somewhat dimming out.

Jesus Christ’s religion in its real form is something that portrays nothing but love, difference comes when the followers tend to go astray from it. The word of God has justice, and justice does demand detriments and favors –that is the rule of nature. It does not matter which religion we are talking about, what matters is the choices that the followers make.



View the
Original article

Sectarian Violence over Religious Issues

on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Sectarian violence threats the security of the religious groups in Pakistan. Lahore, being the capital of Pakistan’s largest province faces such problems every now and then. Around 6 months of research has been conducted on the believers of two distinct sections of Islam. Although Pakistan is an Islamic state but it now engulfs number of sections or sub-religious groups.

We must look into this matter since the spark between the religious groups is creating turbulence in Lahore for quite some time now. The religious segregation has turned out to be very violent in Lahore other than many parts of Pakistan. Pakistan is dealing with the resurgence in sectarian violence, every now and then; violence is experienced between two prominent sections of Islam namely — Sunni and Shia. Lately, Lahore is also experiencing violent incidents between the Barelvi and Deobandi sub-sects of Sunni Islam, which are also on the rise.

Pakistan is the second largest in Shia population after Iran. Sunni are in the majority while Shia are regarded as the minority section of Islam. Sunni- Shia clashes are very brutal in Lahore.

Sectarian violence began to wide spread in Pakistan when the dictator Zia-ul-Haq when policies and legislation aimed at ‘Islamising’. He tried to transform Pakistani into a Sunni state and imposed certain laws that mobilized Shia Muslims such as in 1980 Zia imposed a zakat (wealth tax) and ushr (farming tax) ordinance that contradicted Shia ideologies. This incited mobs as for the first time in the history of Pakistan 100,000 Shia Muslims marched on the federal secretariat in Islamabad, forcing the general to alter the ordinance which are hurting Shia Muslims sentiments.

When Shia were not obliged they refused to pay taxes in the same manner, this prompted Deobandi Sunni groups to target certain Shia persons on the basis of religion. Since then, Pakistan has become a hub of violence between various religious groups. Religion is also being used as a tool to satisfy personal vendetta. Religious sections are growing every single day and creating problems for peace and security of the nation. The rate of fights is increasing among Muslims, and foreign forces are taking greater advantages of it. Pakistan is now being divided which is benefiting the enemies of Pakistan.

Pakistan’s inclusion in US war against terrorist has left it with a series of sectarian problems. Taliban are on the rise since the mid-2000s and their close links with militant sectarian organizations such as Lashkar-eJhangvi is helping the sectarian violence to grow. Sectarian violence has spread across the country, and major areas targeted by it are Baluchistan’s Hazaras (an ethnic minority) and worshippers at Sufi shrines.

Today, sectarian violence has wide spread its tentacles by challenging its internal security. The country has been divided into many religious groups who can’t stand each other; level of tolerance is going down. Taliban are also a greater threat to the sovereignty of Pakistan which are now inclining towards the sectarian problems, the spark is gaining more attention since the government has failed once again to overcome the issues.



View the
Original article

Wilders' Australia visit inspires far right to threaten violence

on Monday, February 4, 2013

White supremacists are urging Australian "patriots" to gather at public meetings by the controversial Dutch MP Geert Wilders, ready for trouble and a no-holds barred fight.

Tensions have been mounting over the impending visit of the far right-wing politician who has been accused of Islamophobia and racism.

One group, Australian New Nation, has been encouraging followers to react to any threat or sign of violence from Muslim protesters who might attend.

On its website, the group has posted an audio from "Radio Free Australia, the voice of white revolution in Australia" warning them to "expect an Islamic rent-a-crowd outside screaming and foaming at the mouth like the evil bastards they are".

"We encourage all patriots to exercise their legal right of self defence if any ragheads try to prevent them accessing the venue, or threaten, or use violence against their person once they try to strike the first blow, everything that follows is self defence on your part," it said.

The vitriolic broadcast, which lasts almost 10 minutes, goes on to say, "go . . . and be prepared to defend yourself and if they take a swing at you, they push at you, they spit on you, don't hold back. You have a legal right of self defence do what should be done to this rag-head camel f--- . . . Islamic filth who have no place in civilised society.

Social media sites protesting against Mr Wilders's visits to Sydney, Melbourne and Perth have also been the target of hate messages.

The Age, 2 February 2013

In response the Q Society, the "counterjihad" group at whose invitation Wilders is visiting Australia, have issued a press release trying to distance themselves from threats of violence.

"Any anti-Islam protests or demonstrations are not associated with Q Society in any way...," they state piously. "Q Society and Geert Wilders distance themselves from any white supremacism and racism in all forms; as we distance ourselves from all groups advocating violence."

The Q Society has invited a raving anti-Muslim bigot to visit Australia in order to incite fear and hatred of Islam, but apparently they have no responsibility whatsoever for any anti-Muslim violence that his visit may inspire.



View the Original article

Halting anti-Muslim violence

on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Many of the recent attacks in the US have taken place shortly after well-publicised anti-Muslim hate speeches, argues Erik Love. Yet "most of these attacks have been dismissed as the work of mentally ill individuals, rather than symptoms of larger social problems".

Al Jazeera, 8 January 2013



View the Original article

Latest Issue of Sectarian Violence in Iraq

on Wednesday, January 2, 2013

Iraq is a country that always remains on center stage in the Arab region. In the past few years, there has been more news coming from Iraq, especially after the invasion of the U.S. in 2003. The situation becomes worse with every passing day, and it is almost like a civil war in Iraq. Now that the U.S. forces left Iraq in December 2011, the new established Iraqi government faces the same issues and problems.

Now, after one year of withdrawal of the American forces, the situation has become a lot more difficult for the local administration and government. The civil war has taken bad shape in Iraq, and there are practically two armed forces ready to fight each other, one of them is loyal to the central government, and the second one is lead by Kurdish regional leaders. Both of these armies have arms, and they have also fired at each other. Now the situation is tense, and the American officials that are sitting in Baghdad are looking to intervene and make the situation peaceful and acceptable for both the major forces.

The situation becomes more sectarian and violent after the issuance of arrest warrants by Shiite government headed by Nuri kamal al-Maliki against Tariq al-Hashimi, Sunni vice president. After this issue, the Sunni community feels more disheartened, and they are more against the government. They are also demonstrating rallies and protests against the government especially after the Jumma prayer. These issues are getting worse with every passing day.

Now there is another debate that is heating up in Iraq, that people are asking for the division of Iraq in three different parts according to three sects, Shiite, Sunni, and Kurd. This debate is making the situation more critical as now everyone wants their own part where they can live according to their sect. This situation is also very critical for the other countries. Turkey has already been worried as they have a large Kurd community living there. So if the Kurds in Iraq get separate places, then they may also demand the same.

On the other hand, the public security in Iraq is very poor, and the people are worried to leave their homes. Last Monday there was an explosion, that killed ten people and injured 46. This is destabilizing the nation. This incident targeted the government officials from both sects. No organization has accepted responsibility for the blast, so if the situation remains the same, there are few chances of any reconciliation between both the parties, and the bloodshed will be increased in coming months.



View the
Original article

ISLAM CONDEMNS TERRORISM AND VIOLENCE

on Tuesday, October 30, 2012

Islam is the most peaceful and loving religion in the world, which is based on the principles of brotherhood and equality. Islam does not permit any Muslim to harm others. Today, it is a negative perception that Islam promotes terrorism, violence and war. The general media has played a very negative role in changing the views of the people around the globe. People rely on the media and is easily influenced by it. It is said that behind every trouble there is always a Muslim, but the following questions will bring you closer to reality:

  • Were the first and the second world wars started by the Muslims?
  • Were the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombed by the Muslims?
  • Who is responsible for the thousands of innocent civilians killed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
  • More than 20 million Aborigines were killed in Australia. By whom? The Muslims?
  • Who was behind the mass murder of over 6 million Jews in Germany? The Muslims?
  • Were Muslims responsible for enslaving around 180 million Africans and later throwing them into the Atlantic Ocean?

ISLAM CONDEMNS TERRORISM

No, they were not Muslims but people from other religions. These are very few examples which never came into discussion in the international media. Islam is a religion of peace and Allah and his messenger have not granted any permission to kill or terrorize other people. There are certain conditions in which Muslims are allowed to fight, but only in self defense. The Prophet Mohammad S.A.W instructed the Muslims during the war time, such that, “Do not kill women or children or non-combatants and do not kill old people or religious people.” The Prophet (PBUH) even ordered, not to cut fruit bearing trees and not to poison the water wells.  Then, how can such a peaceful religion promote terrorism? Islam promotes harmony, and believes in equality, no matter to which religion you belong. Islam does not only believe in ideals, but is also a very practical religion. Islam never allows anyone to enter into war, except in certain conditions. This includes self defense and to fight against any aggression and injustice. Muslims are allowed to fight when they are persecuted and subjected to injustice and cruelty.

In the Holy Qur’an (Surah 22, Verses 39-40), Allah gives permission of war to Muslims who are under oppression and unjust rule. This does not mean that during a war the Muslims are allowed to do whatever they want. Islam does not permit brutal atrocities and condemns the barbaric killing of people. Even the enemy, captured during a war, is to be treated the same way as the Muslims treat their own people. Prophet S.A.W ordered Muslims to offer the enemy, captured during a war, the same food and clothes that the Muslims wear themselves. Islam is a caring religion, and tolerance towards the various cultures in different parts of the world should be practiced always, be it peace or war.

 



View the
Original article

The film against Muslims plays cause eagerness’s and violence among Muslims

on Friday, September 21, 2012

Religion plays a vital role in our lives and helps to achieve our goals in the right way. Religion is the most sacred thing in our life and teaches us equality, tolerance and peace. Tolerance towards other religion plays a vital role in developing inter faith harmony. Most of the problems today are cause by the intolerance and disrespect of individual’s towards other religions. All religion has the same basic teachings that are based on equality, brotherhood and peace. The differences are created by the individuals which results in inter faith clashes. Islam has also suffered a lot because of the west perception about Islamic teachings. West has promoted Islam as a religion that teaches terrorism and violence. This has been done by the western media through talk shows and debates. The blasphemy has been done by the non Muslims in order to show negativity of Islam. Islam is a religion of peace and does not allow any individual to raise weapons. These basic teachings are ignored by these people and they are only showing acts of individuals that are wrong. Few people involved in wrong doings do not represent the Muslims. Muslims love their religion and the messenger of Allah. It has been seen many times that west has ignited the Muslim feelings by making biased films and publications. These are responsible for the violence that erupted in many parts of the world.

People believe in these publications without doing proper research on the basics of Islam. The recent movie launched by an American Terry Jones has once more created a tense environment as it has presented a very bad Islamic image.  The movie was made in America in order to hit the Muslims leaders so that Muslims can be hurt. The movie proved to be a big act of terrorism as t has ignited violence all over the world. It was act of terror that was much devastating than 9/11. In the incident of 9/11 around 2500 people were hurt and this incident has hurt the feelings of 2 billion Muslims around the globe. As a result of this act of hatred American embassy staff was killed by the Muslim protestors. This act was condemned by the Muslims worldwide but only Muslims are not to be blame here. America didn’t ban the movie and said this to be the viewpoint of an individual which was more disturbing for the Muslims. Anger has reached to its peak in the Muslim world and all the American embassies in the Muslim worlds are under huge risk. This is a fact that for every action there is a reaction and this time reaction was much severe and it was not expected by the American authorities. America needs to respect other religions so that the destruction America has brought to the world after 9/11 can be minimized.

 


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

About the author



View the Original article

Australian senator links violence to multiculturalism

on Monday, September 17, 2012

South Australian Liberal senator Cory Bernardi has linked violent scenes between Muslim protesters and police in Sydney to multiculturalism, just days ahead of a major speech by businessman and migrant Frank Lowy.

Mr Lowy is to deliver the inaugural Australian Multicultural Society lecture on the benefits of a multicultural society at Parliament House in Canberra on Wednesday.

"The naive cling to the romantic idealisation of the generations of migrants who have successfully settled in Australia, thinking things will continue just as they have in the past," Senator Bernardi said in a post on his website on Monday.

"They proclaim multiculturalism as a triumph of tolerance when in fact it undermines the cultural values and cohesiveness that brings a nation together."

Senator Bernardi said the events in Sydney should be a wake-up call and he had warned colleagues for years that the violence seen in Western Europe a decade ago could happen here.

"It should serve as a wake-up call to the naive and just plain foolish who are in denial that a significant problem is emerging in Australia," he wrote on his website.

"When are our political and community leaders going to wake up to the fact that what is going on here is exactly the same process that has caused such chaos in some comparable nations?"

Six police were injured, along with 17 others, during violent clashes on Saturday when a group of about 200 Muslims protested in Sydney over an anti-Islam film made in the US.

AAP, 17 September 2012

See also "Protests are a 'wake-up call' to Australians in denial: Bernardi", The Age, 17 September 2012

Media coverage of Saturday's clashes between Muslim protestors and police has unsurprisingly placed the blame exclusively on the protestors. For an alternative view see the eyewitness report from Green Left Weekly.



View the Original article

Harry's Place and its allies inspire far-right violence again

on Saturday, August 25, 2012

The York newspaper The Press reported yesterday that the "Islamia Village" event that was due to be held near the city at Thorpe Underwood Estate over the bank holiday weekend had been called off at the last minute after the estate's Trustees cancelled the booking.

This decision followed an extended campaign against Islamia Village, based on the claim that it would be hosting extremist preachers. The Islamophobic blog Harry's Place, which had initiated the campaign, immediately posted a piece yesterday afternoon claiming victory for itself and its supporters.

The obvious question that arises is – why was Islamia Village called off so late in the day? After all, Harry's Place took up the issue well over a month ago, back on 13 July, when it crossposted a piece from the Islamic Far-Right in Britain blog condemning the event. What changed over the past few days?

Yesterday the Islamia Village organisers issued a statement pointing out that groups including the English Defence League had been demanding for some time that the booking should be cancelled. However: "The campaign had intensified at the beginning of the week, whereby such groups had threatened to cause violence at this weekend's event. Threats of burning down the venue with the people in it have also been made publicly by some supporters of this campaign."

A series of comments posted at HP by a spokesperson for the Trustees of Thorpe Underwood Estate outlining the reasoning that led them to cancel the event sheds further light on this.

Up until this week, it seems, all was proceeding well. According to the Trustees' spokesperson: "This booking WAS checked out with ALL the relevant Government bodies possible and opinion sought as to whether the booking should have been refused. Rather than say, suggest or even infer that perhaps it would be sensible to say 'no', the responses were given as 'positive to proceed'."

The Trustees were not necessarily insisting on banning individuals because of what they were alleged to have said in the past but asked for assurances that speakers would not be engaging in hate speech at Islamia Village. The event organisers, for their part, had made it clear that they were prepared to compromise over the question of speakers and offer the required assurances. The Trustees' spokesperson emphasised that "the event was NOT cancelled because the organisers would not agree to what was being asked of them".

The spokesperson confirmed the organisers' account of the prospect of far-right violence, stating that "the threat to 'burn the buildings down with everyone in them' was made in a 'comment' on a 'Casuals Unlimted' [sic] blog site page". The Casuals (who operate as a particularly thuggish faction within the EDL) had also announced that they would be holding a protest at the event, along with other far-right groupings such as the National Front, Combined ex Forces and the Infidels (the latter two organisations being neo-Nazi offshoots from the EDL), with all the potential for violent confrontation that this implied.

The Trustees' spokesperson stated that: "Safety of those attending probably accounted for 80% of the decision making process.... There was a point when we were almost there but other intelligence information received from Police meant we moved to cancellation." Further, by way of clarification: "The intelligence we received suggested those attending, not those organising, were at risk – given to us as 'clear and present threat'."

Another factor that "made the Trustees believe they had come to the end of the line in attempting to host a non-controversial event that would have been safe for all concerned attending" was that Queen Ethelburga's College on the Thorpe Underwood Estate was being targeted by campaigners:

"This event was nothing to do with Queen Ethelburga's College in any way. Regretably within the most recent 72 hours, the focus seemed to be intent on saying this was an event AT Queen Ethelburga's. It was not. Queen Ethelburga's has 1100 pupils from over 45 different Countries and is multi-cultural in EVERY sense of the word. The Trustees of the Estate were very aware that intense bad publicity for an event THEY were hosting would damage the College unfairly. This was another reason the event was cancelled."

Not that this factor was separable from the issue of far-right violence and intimidation. The Yorkshire-based Nationalist Correspondant blog reported that the NF, CxF, Infidels and other fascist groups had all been harassing Queen Ethelburga's with emails and phone calls, threatening that "a massive protest would be held as close to the school as possible" if the Islamia Village event went ahead. In addition to this, "a contingent from Cxf, and the Infidels went to the Principles [sic] house on Wednesday night to have a 'face to face'."

Needless to say, the fascists are jubilant at their success in depriving hundreds of Muslim families of their anticipated weekend at Islamia Village, and self-congratulatory posts have appeared on far-right sites across the internet (see for example here, here, here and here). So much for HP's stupid assertion that "anti-Muslim hooligans ... will not, on this occasion at least, be claiming a victory for themselves on the back of others' hard work". Of course, given that the fascist campaign against Islamia Village was based entirely on material provided by HP and the Islamic Far-Right in Britain blog (see for example here and here), you can understand why they might be in a state of denial over this.

You may have the feeling that we've been through all this before, and indeed we have. HP and its friends conducted the same sort of inflammatory campaign against a Muslim event that was due to be held at the Connaught Rooms in London in June. Here, again, it was the threat of far-right violence that was the primary factor in getting the booking cancelled.

Any responsible organisation would have concluded that questions about the alleged extremist views of speakers at Islamic events should in future be raised in a way that avoids fuelling violent anti-Muslim racism. Rather than learn any lessons from this earlier debacle, however, HP and its associates responded by denying any blame and lashing out against Islamophobia Watch because we had exposed their role in inciting fascist thuggery.

We would hardly expect anything else from Harry's Place, a notorious extremist blog whose politics may be gauged by the fact that its comments section has for years been infested with racists while one of its leading contributors happily endorses terrorist attacks on Iranian civilians. However, the HP/IFRB campaign was also supported by Hope Not Hate whose attack on Islamia Village was itself crossposted at Harry's Place.

As we have seen, the result of this campaign has been to give a boost to the Islamophobic far right, who were becoming increasingly demoralised by the decline in support for their anti-Muslim street protests. It has led to death threats against the Muslim families who would have attended the Islamia Village event and the intimidation of people at the venue where it was to be held. An organisation like Hope Not Hate whose central aim is to combat the far right should know better.

Update:  The following response from Thorpe Underwood Estate to a complaint about the cancellation of Islamia Village has been posted on the Islamic Awakening forum:

We regret too that this event was cancelled.

At all times we have been willing to negotiate, and discuss various aspects of this booking that was concerning others, with the organisers, and also with those from "outside" who expressed grave concerns.

All our meetings and discussions with the organisers were good, and agreement was either reached, or virtually reached, in most areas.

As a result of that, we kept resisting the constant, and sometimes abusive, threatening and vitriolic, arguments being piled upon us in huge quantities. In the space of just 48 hours, we went from Special Branch Police Officers suggesting to us; there may be a demonstration, but frankly it is quite possible no one will turn up, to perhaps 40 to 50 will turn up, to it is now looking like many hundreds will turn up.

We were then told as late as midday yesterday, that if we have gone from nothing to several hundred in 48 hours, where will we be in the end, with 48 hours still to go to the planned protest?

One person had suggested burning all our buildings with all the Muslims in them - this and several other specific threats of violence and intimidation are now being investigated by the Police and arrests may follow.

Still we held to the belief that the event could continue with Police safeguarding and that there would be nothing said by the speakers, that other non-Muslims could construe, as "hateful, threatening or proposing violence".

The final deciding factor was when it then became evident there was a belief that up to 50 or more, violent anti-Muslim type thugs, may have infiltrated the booking system.

They would thus be allowed legitimate access into the Estate to reside within the same boarding and sleeping accommodation and other parts of the venues, as would come our genuine guests.

They would then cause anything from public disorder to actual physical bodily harm, from within the venue, to the guests.

Whereas there are some strong looking Muslim men who would have been reasonably capable of defending themselves, that could not be said of women and children.

As a result of concern for the actual safety of those genuine Muslims attending, we no longer felt the risk was "manageable".

The Police confirmed to us that their response to this threat from inside, could only ever be, re-active not pro-active.

The Estate, upon making the regrettable decision to cancel the event, then did an immediate refund in full, to the penny, of all monies we had been paid by the organisers, back to them.

Everyone has lost out in this despicable affair. You have lost out, the organisers have suffered financially as they had invested much considerable time and money, and we as an Estate have lost out, as we too invested time and money in preparing, plus hosting up to 60 pre-event organisers, plus providing all the facilities and numerous phone lines and calls, all at no expense, to notify the hundreds of people of the cancellation. Even now we are caring, in a compassionate and sympathetic way, providing necessary sustenance, and other facilities, for those who may turn up, having not been aware of the cancellation. In the circumstances we have made no charge whatsoever for all of this actual hosting and costs incurred.

Regards

Thorpe Underwood Estate

Update 2:  Richard Bartholomew has posted an interesting piece on the cancellation of the Islamia Village event. He identifies the author of the Islamic Far-Right in Britain blog (with what accuracy I don't know) as an individual named Harry Burns who was formerly a leading activist in the EDL's London division.

Update 3:  It would appear that Richard's identification of the IFRB author is accurate. "Harry" – real name Andy Hughes, apparently – has posted a comment confirming this. He claims piously that he wants to see a situation where "the Islamic far right is dealt with in the same way as the nationalist far right".

This from a man who until recently was himself an activist in the nationalist far right, and still has people like Guramit Singh and Joel Titus listed as friends on his Facebook page.



View the Original article

Violence against Rohingya Muslims : Why?

on Wednesday, August 15, 2012

Violence against Rohingya Muslims : Why?

A great number of millions of Muslims in Myanmar have been killed in massive numbers. The lives of those killed are uncountable. Buddhists have been long known to be the most peaceful ones. After seeing the images of the Muslims burnt alive and killed, one cannot do anything but feeling doubtful about the fact of the Buddhists being peace lovers’ community. For the month of June 2012, there has been a great increase in violence against the Muslims. Millions of Muslims in Burma have been left homeless, have been killed are still being slaughtered by the intolerant and increasingly violent Buddhist community.

Since the beginning of the violence against Muslims, no specific reasons have been highlighted for the hatred that the Buddhist community has against the Muslims. These violent episodes have gained great attention from the media and it is said that for decades, the Buddhist has always cashed the opportunity of showing that they are the majority and that the Muslims are the minority. The Buddhist community has always been outrageously angry on the minority Muslims. In these cases, it is seen that the recent riots and violence in Burma has been well planned and most of the routes are based on the planning and involvement of the Burmese government. So many Muslims are being killed and no response is being given by the UN.

The violence against Burmese Muslims are same as that of India. But, the main difference is in the case of the eruption of violence in Burma is periodic and heightened since the year 1920. The Buddhist community has grown increasingly intolerant towards the Muslims.

Most of the Burmese Muslims belong to the western state of Burma, the Arakan state. These Muslims are known as the Rohnigya Muslims. The word ‘Rohingya” is a derived word. The root word is an Arabic word “Raham”, which means sympathy. The Arabs started arriving and settling in Burma since the 8th century and Muslims settlements started to increase. More than 900,000 Muslims live in Burma under a great threat from the Buddhist community.

Religious freedom of the Burmese Muslims has reduced for many years. An increase in violence, harassment and religious intolerance against Muslims has also increased since the incidence of 9/11. Rohingya Muslims are not considered as Burmese citizens. These Muslim minorities are hated by the Buddhists. Rohingya Muslims have since long demanded for the right of citizenship. There are a number of facts that support the killing of Rohingya Muslims by the Buddhist being supported by the Burmese government.

Here, the main fact that needs to be highlighted is that there is a need to pay attention to the demands and basic rights of the Burmese/Rohingya Muslims. The international human rights councils must pay attention to an ever increasing level of violence in Burma.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

About the author

mdemamhasan

I am a writer. writing is my passion. I like to write blog articles ezine articles and different directory sites.



View the Original article

Failing to take far right violence seriously

on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

For at least four decades a small number of specialist academics have pointed to a failure by governments in Europe to take the threat of far right terrorism and political violence sufficiently seriously. This selective blindness has become all the more striking during the decade of the war on terror when the same governments have paid endless attention to the threat of another kind of home grown terrorism and political violence.

Indeed, unintentionally but not unforeseeably, much government rhetoric aimed at home grown 'radical Islamists' in European countries has helped feed far right propaganda that demonises the same targets. This is not to argue that extremist Muslim threats of terrorism and political violence do not exist and do not deserve to be treated seriously. To the contrary, I argue that governments should be alert to both threats and should respond to them in the same way. To be blind to one and overzealous to the other is to risk fuelling both.

Bob Lambert argues for a reorientation of counter-terrorist strategy.

Open Democracy, 23 July 2012



View the Original article

Bill Maher defends Geert Wilders, claims 'moderate Muslims' advocate violence

on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

The Colorado Springs Independent has an interview with US talk show host Bill Maher. He is asked why he featured Geert Wilders in his religion-mocking film Religulous – "wouldn't your hatred for racist xenophobes trump your hatred of religion?" Maher replies that he sees no contradiction:

That's ridiculous. I am certainly not prejudiced against race, religion, whatever. I do think religion is stupid and dangerous, so, yes, I have disdain for religion. But I don't have disdain for people who are religious. Nor are my eyes, you know, looking through rose-colored glasses about people who are influenced by religion to do horrible things. As many people are. And this is the point Geert Wilders is making.

Now, I mean, that was six years ago that we interviewed him. I know a lot has happened in the Netherlands since then. I'm not sure of everything he's said. I don't stand by everything he's said, I'm sure. But he's somebody who is saying: Don't look at religions, and especially the Islamic religion, through rose-colored glasses. And I would totally agree with that.

We interviewed a lot of Muslim people for this movie and, you know, the liberal point of view here in America is, "Yes, all religions are the same. They all try to reach god through the same ..." — Not true! All religions are not the same.

If you ask a lot of Muslim people, and I'm talking about people who are considered moderate Muslims, "Do you think it's OK if violence comes to somebody who insults the prophet?" a lot of them will say: You know what? If you insult the prophet, you get what's coming to you.

OK, that's not how we roll here in the West. And I don't just roll over when I hear that and go, "Well, you know what? That's their religion." Well, maybe that is their religion, but I don't have to agree with it.

But then, what can you expect from a man who fears that Islam will conquer the West, worries that an "alarming" number of "baby Mohammeds" are being born in the UK, and condemns Islam as "a culture that is in its medieval era" and "comes from a hate-filled holy book, the Koran"?

He and Wilders have so much in common. They even offer the same excuse for their bigotry – that their hatred of Islam isn't directed against the individuals and communities who follow that faith.



View the Original article

The truth about far-right violence in Europe

on Friday, June 15, 2012

The Institute of Race Relations has published an important study by Liz Fekete, Pedlars of Hate: the violent impact of the far Right.

The report "documents patterns of violence, from the peddling of hate online and the drawing up of lists of 'national traitors', to violence, arson and murder on the streets, and the stockpiling of weapons in preparation for 'race war'".

The IRR points out that Islamophobia is just one element in the rise of violence on the part of the European far right. While Muslims are the far right's principal targets in western Europe, in eastern Europe it is the Roma who are the main victims, while anti-black racism and antisemitism are also on the increase.

Another worrying development is that "attacks on Social Democrats, Left politicians, academics and journalists that report on the far Right around Europe are intensifying too".

The report can be downloaded here



View the Original article

Does Islam allow Domestic Violence And Honor Killings?

on Wednesday, June 6, 2012

In the Islamic press conferences, which were held in the different countries of the Fatwa (Religious edict) has issued against Honor killings, domestic violence and Misogyny. Different Imams addressed to the masses that ties all things such as honor killings, domestic violence and misogyny are totally UN-Islamic.

If I talk about the honor killings, misogyny and domestic violence and its values in Islam so, honor killings are not allowed in Islam. Those people who kill women in the name of hijab or for other sins they know that honor killing is against the teachings of Islam. On one hand many Muslims have a belief that they can stone a person to death for committing fornication. While on the other hand, sometimes Muslims go to further extremes, for instance cutting the people off completely or disowning them, but to kill them is really not allowed.

So it has been proved that honor killings are UN-Islamic in all ways. The death of innocent people is completely UN-ethical and illegal. There is nothing in the Qur’an that justifies honor killings, and there is nothing that says that you should kill for the honor of the family or for other cause. Honor killings are considered as the major crime.

Domestic violence is also UN-Islamic. Committing violence and fear among the people of the world is not OK or even allowed in Islam. Islamic Imams have issued a Fatwa regarding the domestic violence. In an Islamic press conference, Islamic Imams considered the domestic violence as the UN-Islamic activities. Most people Do that believing that it is their right, but they do not have an understanding about the good and bad deeds.

Muslims are not allowed to Do such bad deeds causing damage or any harm to others. Actually, the relation between the Islam and the domestic violence is disputed in all ways. Domestic violence among the Muslim community is so common; in fact it is a human rights issue. For instance, in Muslim community, Muslim women are often considered inferior to the men or their husbands. But Islam totally condemns Domestic violence. In the regard of domestic violence the prophet Muhammad, on who is peace, said that “no believing man should hold a grudge against a believing woman”. Many verses of the Qur’an prove that the domestic violence is not allowed in Islam.

If I talk about Misogyny, so it is also not allowed in Islam, and we can consider it as UN-Islamic. Basically, misogyny is the hatred for women. If you dislike a woman and consider her as lower than man, so it will be UN-ethical. Because of these types of discrimination, a society gap can develop. And this gap will be harmful to the people of society especially for the women. There are numerous ways of Misogyny such as sexual discrimination, violence against women and the denigration of women.

In this way Honor Killings, Domestic Violence and Misogyny Are UN-Islamic and Major Crimes. And fatwa have already issued regarding these activities.



View the Original article

Anti-Islam group provokes German violence

on Monday, May 7, 2012

The Interior Minister of Germany's western state of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) has blamed a far-right group that displayed lampooning cartoons of Prophet Mohammed (peace and blessing be upon him) outside mosques for a recent cycle of violence in the European country.

The actions of the extremist anti-Islam group, "Pro NRW", in Bonn on Saturday had been a "deliberate provocation" that had triggered reprisals by Salafists, Ralf Jäger, the NRW Interior Minister, was quoted as saying by Deutsche Welle on Monday, May 7.

Gathering outside the Saudi Fahd Academy in Bonn's suburb of Mehlem, "Pro-NRW" supporters showed caricatures depicting a man said to be the prophet.

Hundreds of Salafi Muslims gathered in response to protest the rightist rally, which developed into clashes that left 29 policemen injured. More than 100 Salafist protesters were briefly arrested.

OnIslam, 7 May 2012

See also Spiegel Online, 7 May 2012



View the Original article

German far-right party plans to demonstrate outside mosques – Hans-Peter Friedrich scaremongers over Salafist violence

on Monday, April 30, 2012

A far-right party on the campaign trial in Germany's most populous state is threatening to put caricatures of Mohammed outside mosques in a string of cities.

The "Pro NRW" party in the western state of North Rhine-Westphalia has already shown anti-Islamic caricatures in Essen and Gelsenkirchen, though the police prevented demonstrations taking place directly outside mosques.

Police have also banned "Pro NRW", which is campaigning on an Islamophobic platform, from using the Danish cartoons that caused massive protests in the Islamic world in 2005.

But "Pro NRW" intends to send activists to 25 mosques throughout the state in the run-up to the election on May 13, staging protests in Cologne, Bonn, Düsseldorf, Aachen, Wuppertal and Solingen. A report in Die Welt newspaper on Sunday said the far-right party intended to post around 100 what it called "Islam-critical" drawings outside the mosques.

Interior Minister in state Ralf Jäger condemned the campaign and expressed support for planned counter-demonstrations. "Pro NRW is committing spiritual arson," he told the paper. "The party is consciously taking into account that Muslims will feel provoked and upset. The authorities will exhaust all legal avenues to prevent a xenophobic hate campaign."

The federal Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich is reportedly worried about violent confrontations with the Salafists, the fundamentalist Muslims who began distributing free copies of the Koran in Germany three weeks ago. A report in Der Spiegel magazine over the weekend said his ministry had been in contact with the North Rhine-Westphalia state government in recent weeks to find a way to de-escalate the situation. The election there is on May 13.

"Pro NRW" campaign manager Lars Seidensticker says he did not understand the outrage over the campaign, and says his party would bear no responsibility for any violence.

"If the situation is so tense that you can't do a campaign like this against Islamist influences any more, then the politicians are responsible for doing away with Germany," he said, alluding to the title of a 2010 book by banker Thilo Sarrazin ("Germany Does Away with Itself"), which criticized Islamic immigrants in Germany.

"Mosques are potential centres of a new civil war that we have to prevent," said Seidensticker. "That's why we have to pull out the Islamist evil by its roots."

"Pro NRW", which boasts 250 members, is also planning to award a cash prize for the "best" anti-Islamic caricature, named after Danish cartoonist Kurt Westergaard, who was responsible for the 2005 images. Westergaard has distanced himself from the competition and is reportedly considering legal action against the party for using his name.

The Local, 30 April 2012



View the Original article