Showing posts with label under. Show all posts
Showing posts with label under. Show all posts

Non-Muslims under Islam

on Monday, September 16, 2013

Islam means peace, and it respects and propagates the concept of humanity in all its teachings. All humans are to be treated with respect, love and kindness according to the teachings of Islam. Non Muslims under Islam have many rights and are given great protection and security. The Prophet (PBUH) has cautioned his followers from being cruel to the non-Muslims, and that we should always give them their rights.

Some people have a misconception that Islam does not allow you to be friends or have dealings with non-Muslims, but that is not true at all, and the Quran (Surah 60:8-9) proves that very well.

If we look at examples in history even Non-Muslim prisoners of war were treated with great kindness and humanity. The Noble Prophet (PBUH) said regarding non Muslim prisoners of war that they were Muslims’ brothers, and Allah had put them in the hands of Muslims so that they would give them food, clothes, work and help.

Islam also gives religious freedom to all Non-Muslim citizens living in an Islamic state. Islam does not compel non-Muslims to embrace it. It is every non Muslims’ right to practice whatever religion he follows, and no Muslim has any right to make fun of any religion, or hurt the feelings of any non Muslim. Islam is a religion of peace and personal choice, no Muslim has the right to mock or force any non Muslim to embrace Islam.

The second Chaliph of Islam; Hazart Umar (RA) used to ask people who came to him from various provinces about the well being of non Muslims, and whether they have any complaints, or faced any kind of oppression in these provinces.



View the
Original article

Malala Yousafzai Will Have To Live Under Security for The Rest Of Her Life

on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Malala Yousafzai, a Pakistani teenager ,was recently shot by the Taliban because she refused to abandon campaigning for girls’ education in the country. According to sources she is now a target for enemies and will have to live under tight security for the rest of her life.

This 15-year-old girl was shot in the head by a Taliban member as she was riding a bus home from school. Right now she being taken care of in a Britain hospital and is recovering quite well. Ever since the attack that occurred in October, there has been a campaign that has been started for her to win the Nobel Peace Prize.

Malala has said to her caretakers that she wants to return to her home country of Pakistan, but the Interior Minister Rehman Malik says that she will be a target and it will be quite unsafe for her to return. The Interior Minister has also said that the school that she used to attend in Mingora will still bear her name despite many people protesting that there may be attacks that could occur on the school. There are around 120 students that are protesting and are not attending school; they are also ripping up pictures of Malala Yousafzai to protest the renaming of Sadiu Sharif Girls College to Government P.G Malala Yousufzai. The students have given a three day deadline for the district to change the name of the school because they fear that they might face attack while Malala is completely safe in Britain.

The students say that they want the government to remove everything that bears her name because the Taliban are totally against Malala. They are out to destroy everything that has her name on it, including the girls’ college. Mr. Rehman Malik said that they will not change the name of the school because it is a tribute to honor her courage in the country. Mr. Malik has also said that he is very grateful to the British Government for being so kind and offering to treat her at the Birmingham’s Queen Elizabeth Hospital. The doctors there are taking good care of her and will decide when it is appropriate to send her back to Pakistan.

Rehman Malik and the people of Pakistan are hopeful that when she gets better she will be able to move, walk, talk, and live a normal life. The only thing is that she will have to remain under tight security for the rest of her life, for the courageous act that she has committed. Ever since this attack, Malala has not just become popular in Pakistan, but she has gained a reputation as a hero all over the world. She is now an icon for the education of females and a role model for the country of Pakistan. This 15-year-old girl has shown a lot of courage that much older individuals are not even able to accomplish, and this is why she is an icon for many Pakistanis.

 



View the
Original article

Egypt’s Army Insists that Sinai is Under Control

on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Sinai is a very valuable part of Egypt, and it has a unique place in the hearts of all Egyptians and Muslims because of its history with Prophets and history with wars. Egyptian young men died to get Sinai back after Israel’s occupation in 1973; however, after the January 25, revolution, Sinai witnessed a number of terrorist attacks, which caused worries to spread all over Egypt and Israel. The Egyptian army spokesman said that Sinai is under control and the army is working to end the militants or Jihadi groups working in Sinai, while Israel insists that Sinai is full of Jihadi groups that work to attack the boarders of Israel, like the attack took place in August 2012.

In Ramdan, when Muslims fast from dawn to sunset, militants attacked Egyptian soldiers on the boarders by sunset, which resulted in killing 15 Egyptian security personnel, besides tens were injured. The attackers used a pickup truck equipped with explosives to breach the boarders, while they stole an army vehicle and drove it about a mile inside Israel before a missile killed the attackers and exploded the vehicle.

Eight militants were killed in this operation and Israel gave the bodies of the dead attackers to Egypt. During the examination of the attackers’ bodies it was found that their shoes were “made in Palestine”, which means that the attackers may have came to Egypt from Gazza. Also there are possibilities that the attackers were trained by Hammas in Gazza; however, no one knows the reason that may encourage Hammas to participate in such attack in that time, although attacking Israel boarders can be a good reason for Hammas to work in Sinai.

On the other side, this attack represented a test for Egypt’s President Mohamed Morsi and his relationship with Israel. Israeli military intelligence had information about the attack days before it happened, and reports say that Israel shared such information with Egypt, but it doubted that the Egyptian authorities would take an action to avert the attack. Ehud Barack, Israel’s Minister of Defense said after the attack “I hope this will be a wake up call for Egypt regarding the necessity to be sharp and efficient on their side”

About two months ago the Egyptian army started an operation called it “Nesr” or “Eagle” to clean Sinai from militants and Jihadists, besides destroying the tunnels between Gazza and Sinai, which is heavily used to transfer weapons, drugs and criminals between both sides.

The Egyptian army said in its statements that it killed hundreds of Jihadists and destroyed more than 120 tunnels, and the operation is still running. Yet, reports continue to come with expectations that Jihadists are preparing for a huge operation to revenge for the dead attackers in August and this is why Israel insists that Sinai is not yet under control.

The coming days should see more actions taken by the Egyptian army and more cautious from Israel side. Both sides should have learned from the lesson and Mohamed Morsi now knows that the people in Egypt won’t let it go, if more soldiers were killed by militants or Jihadists.

About the author



View the Original article

An Era Under Attack by E.L. Lockhart

on Thursday, November 15, 2012

The ancient pyramids are both an Egyptian landmark and one of the proclaimed Seven Wonders of the World. Tens of millions of people flock to visit them each year, and few of the world’s school curriculums are void of them, or the stories of the rich and ancient culture that erected them so long ago.

Many people were alarmed when radical Jihadist Murgan Salem al-Gohary, during an Egyptian TV interview, Saturday, called for the destruction of the Sphinx and Pyramids in Giza. Al-Gohary was previously jailed twice, one of which ended in a life sentence for violent crimes, but he was let out under the new government regime and supposedly joined the Taliban. He was quoted as stating, “All Muslims are charged with applying the teachings of Islam to remove such idols, as we did in Afghanistan when we destroyed the Buddha statues.” He added that the act was, “Something the government failed to do.”

The incident he refers to is the horrific demolition of the 2,000 year-old Buddhist statues carved into the Hindu Kush Mountains in the central province of Bamiyan, Afghanistan in March, 2001. An international outcry went out, calling for the preservation of the historical and priceless site, including pleads from France, The United States and UN General-Secretary. None of the petitions were answered and the mountain was fired upon using anti-aircraft missiles and tank fire before the mountain and remaining statues were destroyed with dynamite. One of such statues was the world’s tallest standing Buddha of its time, measuring 50 meters (165 feet) in height.

The Pyramids and surrounding landmarks are currently maintained by the Egyptian government. The sites are argued to be the main driving forces to Egypt’s tourism industry, which documented nearly 11 billion dollars in revenue in 2008 alone. To destroy these sites would cost an innumerable amount not only for its demolition and removal, but costing the country an untold amount in revenue from its tourism industry – such numbers that do not include the hotel industry or the jobs tourists provide to approximately 12 percent of Egypt’s population.

The archeological worth of the Giza Pyramids, as well as the Sphinx, is priceless. Digs and site preservation for research continue to this day, and we search for answers about the ancient Egyptian culture. It comes as a shock that many would support such an outlandish claim that the Sphinx should be destroyed, with such historical and cultural value. This is not the first time, though, that the monuments have come under attack. Many extremist rulers of Egypt have been recorded as defacing and damaging the Sphinx, including Mohammed Sa’im al-Dahr in 1380, who damaged the ears and nose of the Sphinx and supposedly was subsequently lynched for such an act.

But self-proclaimed Taliban Jihadist, al-Gohary, has stated that The Prophet calls for all idols to be destroyed. To simply and peacefully retort the claims that sites sacred to non-Muslims are to be sought out and destroyed, the passage of the Qu’ran 5:48 fits well. Muhammad stated to a group of individuals arguing over which religion had supremacy over the other, “If God so willed, He would have made all of you one community, but he has not done so, in order that he may test you according to what he has given you; so compete in goodness. To God shall you all return, and He will tell you the truth about what you have been disputing.”

-E.L.Lockhart



View the
Original article

299 women reported under veil ban law says French interior ministry

on Wednesday, April 11, 2012

One year after France introduced a law banning women from wearing full-face veils in public, officials report that around 300 have been fined reported.

The ban on wearing the niqab in any public place was introduced on April 11th 2011. It is illegal for any woman to wear the veil except when they are at home, worshipping in a religious place or travelling as a passenger in a private car. Wearing the veil can lead to a fine of €150 ($200) and forced attendance at a citizenship class.

Interior ministry officials reported that "in one year there have been 354 police checks and 299 fines issued reports made," reported Le Parisien newspaper.

At the time of the law being passed, officials estimated that around 2,000 women were wearing the full-face veil. In January, interior minister Claude Guéant told parliament that "the number of women wearing the veil has fallen by half" since the law was introduced.

Rachid Nekkaz of the group "Touche pas à ma Constitution" (Don't Touch My Constitution) claims that 367 women have been fined and questioned in police stations for "between one and a half and three hours." Two-thirds of the women questioned are divorced or single, according to Nekkaz. He believes this proves the women are not wearing the veil "by force of a husband."

The Local, 11 April 2012

See also Deutsche Welle, 11 April 2012

Update:  I should know better than to rely on The Local's French news section. The 299 figure is for women who have been reported for breaking the veil law. RFI says that only about 20 have actually been fined.



View the Original article

299 women fined under veil ban law says French interior ministry

on

One year after France introduced a law banning women from wearing full-face veils in public, officials report that around 300 have been fined.

The ban on wearing the niqab in any public place was introduced on April 11th 2011. It is illegal for any woman to wear the veil except when they are at home, worshipping in a religious place or travelling as a passenger in a private car. Wearing the veil can lead to a fine of €150 ($200) and forced attendance at a citizenship class.

Interior ministry officials reported that "in one year there have been 354 police checks and 299 fines issued," reported Le Parisien newspaper.

At the time of the law being passed, officials estimated that around 2,000 women were wearing the full-face veil. In January, interior minister Claude Guéant told parliament that "the number of women wearing the veil has fallen by half" since the law was introduced.

Rachid Nekkaz of the group "Touche pas à ma Constitution" (Don't Touch My Constitution) claims that 367 women have been fined and questioned in police stations for "between one and a half and three hours." Two-thirds of the women questioned are divorced or single, according to Nekkaz. He believes this proves the women are not wearing the veil "by force of a husband."

The Local, 11 April 2012

See also Deutsche Welle, 11 April 2012

]]>

View the Original article