Showing posts with label through. Show all posts
Showing posts with label through. Show all posts

A Bitter Attempt towards Legalizing Terror through Drone Attacks by CIA

on Wednesday, February 27, 2013

A Concise introduction and account of the Playbook can be presented as a function towards establishing certain rules and regulations, in relation to the mysterious and the stealthy Drone Attacks conducted by the CIA around the globe. It also functions to set rules that would legalize the actions of the drones mentioned herewith and to mitigate the rate at which these attacks are conducted.

This is something that the US Government needs to consider on a profound and intense note, in light of the heavy criticism and ridicule that it is facing and receiving from its many supporters and people, as well. This criticism is mainly directed towards the government’s uncontrolled and unhindered dependence on technological warfare. This outrage from different nations and people across the world towards drone attacks has culminated in the form of an immensely strong opposition by the world against drone attacks.

Perhaps this is an approach towards capturing the essence of what the nations of the world want in the future, in response to the unbiased and misdirected show of the US in terms of its might and military strength against defenseless and feeble third world nations.

These are countries where the war being fought is not even of conventional or traditionally recognizable tendencies. However, the most appalling and fascinatingly curious aspect of this Playbook by Brennan is that the Laws it entails are not applicable to Pakistan and Yemen in relation to Drone Strikes.

Why is it so, you asking?

You cannot inquire at all.

The leak of the Document by the Justice Department has led to much uproar and outrage from the public over the unjust killing of US citizens by the state itself. The case of “Al-Aulaqi” has been the recipient of much attention and coverage. As a side effect of the leak in question, the state has become the object of inquisition by the public regarding the definition that the former uses in relation to recognizing and branding terrorists.

All of this combined won’t put an end to Drone Strikes. In fact, the US is packing up its military operations in Afghanistan. But their absence is likely to be substituted with more of a technological offensive, meaning aerial strikes that are devoid of a mortal manning quality.

Ever since this year’s threshold has been crossed, there has been a sharp incline in the rate of these attacks. Bill Roggio from the Long War Journal reported the demise of 11 civilians in the four attacks committed in the first two weeks of January.

The incident involving the death of about 38 civilians in a single precision strike during March 2011 is also much appalling. It is impossible to ascertain the true toll of death and destruction as the areas decimated by the CIA are closed to journalists, government related functionaries and other such peers.

War of a conventional sort brings about much in the way of collateral damage, that is what the drone supports present forth as an argument.

But is this truly a War that is being fought?

Are we privy to the true identity of our enemy?

Is the demise of Osama actually hastening the march towards world tranquility and peace?

Will the decimation of further militants of the sort eradicate terrorism?

The truth is that terrorism is something that cannot be annihilated or destroyed through the means of military might alone.

Ever since the terrorist incident orchestrated by the Al-Qaeda, there has not been one single US Citizen death from terrorism. In contrast, about 150 children have perished in school shootings initiated since 2003.

Perhaps it is time for the US to quit is countering terrorism worldwide and pay a bit more mind and attention to its laws and regulations, regarding guns and weaponry.

 



View the
Original article

EDL to stage rally but not march through Cambridge

on Tuesday, January 29, 2013

The English Defence League (EDL) will not be marching through Cambridge, but will be kept to one place in the city, police said.

The Cambridgeshire force is planning its strategy to deal with the demonstration by the right- wing group which has protested against the building of a new mosque off Mill Road.

But almost 700 protesters have signed up to march against the group under the banner of Cambridge Unite Against Fascism (CUAF). Muslim leaders and politicians have signed a list opposing the EDL's planned march on February 23.

Richard Rose, of CUAF, said: "I think it is a clear sign of the weakness of EDL that they are now having a static protest rather than a march.

"We are delighted they will not be marching through Cambridge and we want them to have their little gathering in an out-of-the-way place such as an out-of-town car park and not in the city centre which would cause disruption.

"We are also pleased with the amount of support we've had including from the three mosques in Cambridge and from more councillors. We want to send a clear message that the EDL is not wanted here and they have no support."

Cambridge News, 29 January 2013



View the Original article

Bridging Cultures Through Language

on Monday, November 5, 2012

Bridging Cultures

Some languages have very strong similarities. For example, English and German are 60% similar, and English and French are about 30% similar. English and Spanish are also remarkably similar. Where languages are similar, it is common to find strong cultural similarities as well. English is considered by many to be completely unrelated to Arabic, creating yet another divide between the East and West.

Bridging Cultures Through Language

Although we tend to hold a romantic view of Europe’s Middle Ages, it was actually a time of uncertainty, warfare, illiteracy, tyrannical rule, invading armies, and large-scale ignorance. Following the Arab conquests in the Middle East, Arabs from North Africa moved into Spain and helped civilize a society that had been ravaged by the Dark Ages. These settlers, known as Moors, brought math, architecture, writing, literature, and many other contributions to Medieval Spain. Though they were expelled by Ferdinand and Isabella in the 15th century, their contributions can still be seen today. For example, prior to Arab culture seeping into Europe, the only number system used was Roman numerals. Complex calculations were impossible with this cumbersome system. However, the Arabs brought in a system of numerals that enabled engineering and architecture to flourish. In fact, today the number system that we use today is called Arabic numerals.

Cultural bridging

It was during the time of the Moors that the Spanish language began to evolve into what it is today. With the Arab Muslims living next to the Spanish Christians and Jews, and in a high degree of peace, the Arabic language seeped into Spanish. Today, many Spanish words bear a strong resemblance to their Arabic counterparts. For example, the classical Arabic word for “woman” is “emra’aeh,” and the Spanish word is “hombra.” The two are pronounced almost exactly the same.

It was at the end of the Middle Ages and the beginning of the Renaissance that modern English began to develop. English is a conglomeration of many European languages, including German, French, and Spanish. Many Arabic words that transitioned into the Spanish vocabulary found their way into English. For example, the Arabic word “‘amin” means “trust” or “security.” And the English word “amnesty” means that two groups have formed a mutual trust. The Arabic word “karsh” means “shark.” It is rather astonishing that the two words are almost exactly the same, with the letters in reordered.

Our numeral system and many English and Spanish words are only two examples of how modern Western civilization has many of its roots in Arab culture. We truly are indebted to our Arab predecessors, and would do well to remember that.



View the
Original article

Jesus through Muslims’ Eyes

on Friday, November 2, 2012

A wide misconception prevails in the west is that Muslim do not believe in Jesus. However, Christians might be surprised to discover that Jesus Christ is acclaimed throughout Islam, which is the world’s second largest faith. We Muslims also believe in the Virgin Birth and Jesus’ miracles, but it goes much further in regards to the shared interest of his message. In the Muslims view, Jesus’ indispensable work was to complement the legalism of the Torah with a compassion rarely expressed in the Old Testament. The great Jesus confirmed the Torah, developed the significance of sympathy and self-purification, and established them as the decisive links between the words of God’s message and possessing the wisdom. Muslims also believe that Jesus emphasized on the continuity of his ancestry.

Waraqa bin Nawfal was the uncle of Bibi Khadija, Hazrat Muhammad’s Wife. He was an early Arab Christian and a resident of Mecca. He was mystical by nature and could read Hebrew. One day when Prophet Muhammad (P.B.U.H) was forty years old, Bibi Khadija brought Him to Waraqa bin Nawfal. Prophet (B.B.U.H) was a respected family man till that time, and he was frightened somehow. He told Waraqa that one evening on the outskirts of town he was meditating in a cave. While he was half asleep, he noticed something disturbing and he got scared when he heard a voice speaking to him. At that time Hazrat Muhammad (P.B.U.H) was unaware that it was his first encounter with angel Gabriel, the messenger of Allah. Waraqa after listening to Prophet’s encounter assured him that he was not possessed.

He told Prophet (P.B.U.H) that the voice he heard was of the same pious messenger God sent to Moses. Moreover, he wished to be alive till Hazrat Muhammad (P.B.U.H) would become prophet and His own people would expel him. Hazrat Muhammad (P.B.U.H) was astonished to hear about his future rejection, he asked Waraqa the reason. Old Waraqa said, “No one has ever brought his people the news you bring without meeting hostility. If I live to see the day, I will support you.”  From Waraqa’s remarks Christians could recognize an aphorism related with Jesus. “A prophet is not without honor, save in his own country.
It is noticeable that even today, when Jesus’ name is mentioned, Muslims always followed it by the phrase “peace and blessings be upon him,” as Muslims still venerate him as a prophet. “We believe in God, and in what has been sent down to us, what has been revealed to Abraham and Ishmael, and Isaac and Jacob and their offspring and what was given to Moses and to Jesus, and all the other prophets of the Lord. We make no distinction among them.”

These lines from the Qur’an make it clear that Jesus has been regarded as one of the world’s great teachers by the Muslims. Furthermore, Jesus is a unique sort of prophet among Muslims, a messenger authorized to converse divinity not only in words but by miracles as well.



View the
Original article

A Relation Between East And West Through Social Websites

on Thursday, August 16, 2012

Ten years before, there was not any beforehand apparatus of communication, through which people can share information, news of their religion and other relevant knowledge with each other. But in this age of advance technology and the internet, abounding amusing networking has been developed. Social networking sites are basically the platforms on which social networks build between and among people. Through these sites, people share their interest, background, knowledge and other things with each other. Basically, social networking sites are the connecting tools between and among the people of different societies, cultures and countries. The most popular social networking sites of today’s age are Facebook and tweeter. The social networking sites can also be known as social media forums. People have a general question that how Facebook and other social media forums can help to integrate Muslims and West.

This question can be answered by observing the today’s era in which Facebook and other social media forums are helping to integrate Muslims and West. Through the social networking sites, people from the different societies connect each other. By this social connection, people from the West can know about the Muslim religion, its values, customs and all other things about it. Because of these social media forums such as Facebook and Twitter, many people from the Western countries have converted their religion into Islam.

In this way, social networking websites make it possible to connect Muslims and Non-Muslims with each other. They share their interests and activities across religious, political, economical, and geographical borders. A lot of online communities have been created, which have spread the Islamic activities throughout the world, especially in the West. Facebook and other social networking tools are increasing the impact of one society and culture on another society.

We can observe that, because of the social media forums, culturization is also taking place between and among societies. The social media forum is an online platform that focuses on the building of social networks between Muslims and the West. Through emails and instant messages, one person either Muslim or Non-Muslim can better understand about the other people’s religions and his life style. It has been seen that when Non-Muslims hear about the religion of Muslims through instant messages, they find it interesting and want to enter the boundaries of Islam. They start to adopt the Islamic values, customs and other activities. Non-Muslims feel very good by knowing about the purity of Islam; they want to offer prayers, reciting Quran, perform Hajj and want to do fasting as well.

A report says that 50% western and other people regularly enter into the arena of Islam, and adore its authentic. So we can say that Facebook and other social media forums can help to integrate Muslims and West. They build a connection between East and West.   In short media and social media has a big role to play to bridge the gap between Muslims and West.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

About the author

Jawad Ahmad

I am 24 years old and i have done Masters in Business Administration (Finance) from a recognized university.
Right now i am doing freelancing and writing articles on different projects.



View the Original article

A journey through the nature of doubt in Latin, Greek and Arabic Languages – Part 5

on Tuesday, July 3, 2012

V – Other consequences of narrowness for you to think for yourselves

In the previous post, I have tried to explain how doubt is like an obstructed strait that does not allow the conveyance of goods, thus giving origin to difficulty and poverty. As promised, in this final part of the article I will share with you some other consequences of narrowness, leaving you to do the reasoning for yourselves.

In the third part of my analysis, I’ve showed you that Latin verb suspendo, to hang, and to make uncertain or doubtful, “which, in turn, made it possible to be used tropically to denote both what is uncertain, doubtful, and wavering, hesitating“. Well, I’ll now add one other meaning: to choke to death by hanging, a meaning similar with Latin verb ango‘s to press together – and in relation to the throat, to throttle, strangle, this explaining why the verb ended up being used metaphorically both to to feel or suffer pain, and, most frequently, of the mind, to distress, torment. This is from were angustia is derived. Literally meaning a narrow pass, strait, when used metaphorically, angustia was synonym not only with want, indigence, poverty but also with difficulty, distress, perplexity. English anguish, Portuguese angústia, Spanish angustia, French angosse, all derived from angustia.

Let us stick with the throat, in particular with the windpipe, that sort of tube that allows the passage of air… because I would like to talk a bit about breathing, especially the breathing that is typical of climbing or of running, both of them situations during which breathing is rendered difficult. The Latin word that names this panting is anhelatio, and the action of panting is anhelo, to move about for breath; hence, to draw the breath with great difficulty, to pant, puff, gasp. You may not know its equivalent nowadays, but it probably helps if I say that Spanish anhelo is a derivative, and that it means to have a yen, yearning.

Next thing I want to do is to invite you to pay attention to the following ayat “[…] and whoever He wants to misguide, He makes his breast tight and constricted as though he were climbing into the sky.”  (6:125) The English words tight and constricted are translations of Arabic roots حرج (hrj) and ضيق (Diq), respectively – I’ve talked about them in the previous post, where we’ve seen that the first Arabic root means strait, or narrow; to become contracted, to doubt; to be in difficulty; and that the second one, narrow, or strait (a thing, a place); difficult, or distressing; doubt in the heart, straitness in the mind; poverty. I now want to add صعد (S’d), translated as climbing in the above mentioned ayat, and denoting a breathing with an expression of pain, grief or sorrow, or with difficulty; a long breathing. Before leaving you with your thoughts, I’ll just ask: is there any bridge on the horizon?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

View the Original article

A journey through the nature of doubt in Latin, Greek and Arabic Languages – Part 4

on Friday, June 29, 2012

In the previous post I was drawn to conclude that suspicion, in its own peculiar nature, founds itself on the consideration of things that are uncertain and doubtful themselves. Through what we’ve seen so far, I think it is correct to assume that suspicion is not necessarily endemic to the wavering doubt, but it sure is endemic in a context where doubt has come to an halt. In other words, some individuals do maintain their wavering doubt throughout their entire life, whereas others put an end to the balancing of uncertainty by erecting a personal creed that is not founded on a firm basis.

IV Part – Straitening doubt

I would now like to invite you to consider another kind of doubt that we can find in two Arabic roots: حرج (hrj), strait, or narrow; to become contracted, to doubt; to be in difficulty; and ضيق (Diq), narrow,  or strait (a thing, a place); difficult, or distressing; doubt in the heart, straitness in the mind; poverty. These two roots bear a striking evidence of what seems to be an association between doubt and that which is narrow, which, in turn, is associated with both difficulty and poverty.

I find it very interesting to see something similar to this in Greek word aporos, meaning without passage, having no way in, out, or through; hence, of places, impassable; of states or circumstances, impracticable, difficult; and of persons, without means or resources, helpless; poor, needy. You might be thinking that this word is lacking the notion of narrowness… But it isn’t; in fact, the word derives from poros, originally used to denote a means of passing a river, a ford, ferry, being as well used as synonym of a strait, that is, a narrow part of the sea. Through this idea of a narrow passage, poros was also used to allude to those tiny passages in the skin – the pores. But what I really would like you to keep in mind is that poros‘ general meaning was that of means of achieving, accomplishing, as for instance the means for performing a journey.

But you may now be asking yourselves where’s doubt in those Greek words? To answer to your pertinent question I’ll have to introduce one other Greek word, formed with that same root por-. The word is porew, that means, carry, convey by land or water, traverse. So, what we have here is the implicit idea of a passage through which something is carried. Now, if you add the prefix ‘a’ you get aporew, that is, without means or resources (just like aporos) – in other words, that passage through which things were conveyed no longer exists, and that’s why the word means, of things, to be left wanting; and in general, to be at loss, be in doubt, be puzzled.

Let’s now go back to poros as the means of passing a river to add that we find this same meaning in Arabic root عبر (‘br), a thing by means of which one crosses a river (a boat, a bridge or some other thing) – but as it also means interpreting, explaining, or studying a thing, it is possible to assume that having a means of passing, or traversing, an obstacle such as a river is the same as having the means to study and thus understand what is not known. So, basically, doubt in aporew is referred to as the same as the lacking of means to carry or convey understanding.

As to poverty being associated with the lack of means to carry things through a passage… it suffices you to remember that what we call trade is strictly dependent on the possibility of using certain means to import or export goods, and that the lack of passages to the sea, for instance, is what fuels conflicts like the one between Ethiopia and Eritrea, the first of them being called a landlocked country, that is, a country that is not only cut off from sea resources, but also impeded of having access to seaborne trade. This same notion adopts one other aspect in the word embargo, that literally means to stay in the port, that is, the prohibition of ships to sail, thus impeding the conveyance of goods. More recently, embargos’ aim is to act as a barrier to the passage of all sorts of goods, thus weakening, and eventually, leading a country to poverty, as was the case of the embargo imposed by the United Nations Security Council on Iraq.

In the final part of this article, I’ll leave you with some other consequences of narrowness for you to think for yourselves

Related posts:

  1. A journey through the nature of doubt in Latin, Greek and Arabic Languages – Part 3 In the previous post, I’ve tried to show how shakin,...
  2. A journey through the nature of doubt in Latin, Greek and Arabic Languages – part 1 In this article you will be following a journey through...
  3. A journey through the nature of doubt in Latin, Greek and Arabic Languages – Part 2 In the previous post, we’ve discovered that the act of...
  4. Why was the Quran revealed in Arabic? (III Part) In the previous post, i’ve tried to show why Arabic...
  5. Why was the Quran revealed in Arabic? (II Part) In the previous post, i’ve tried to show that the...


View the Original article

A journey through the nature of doubt in Latin, Greek and Arabic Languages – Part 4

on Thursday, June 28, 2012

In the previous post I was drawn to conclude that suspicion, in its own peculiar nature, founds itself on the consideration of things that are uncertain and doubtful themselves. Through what we’ve seen so far, I think it is correct to assume that suspicion is not necessarily endemic to the wavering doubt, but it sure is endemic in a context where doubt has come to an halt. In other words, some individuals do maintain their wavering doubt throughout their entire life, whereas others put an end to the balancing of uncertainty by erecting a personal creed that is not founded on a firm basis.

IV Part – Straitening doubt

I would now like to invite you to consider another kind of doubt that we can find in two Arabic roots: حرج (hrj), strait, or narrow; to become contracted, to doubt; to be in difficulty; and ضيق (Diq), narrow,  or strait (a thing, a place); difficult, or distressing; doubt in the heart, straitness in the mind; poverty. These two roots bear a striking evidence of what seems to be an association between doubt and that which is narrow, which, in turn, is associated with both difficulty and poverty.

I find it very interesting to see something similar to this in Greek word aporos, meaning without passage, having no way in, out, or through; hence, of places, impassable; of states or circumstances, impracticable, difficult; and of persons, without means or resources, helpless; poor, needy. You might be thinking that this word is lacking the notion of narrowness… But it isn’t; in fact, the word derives from poros, originally used to denote a means of passing a river, a ford, ferry, being as well used as synonym of a strait, that is, a narrow part of the sea. Through this idea of a narrow passage, poros was also used to allude to those tiny passages in the skin – the pores. But what I really would like you to keep in mind is that poros‘ general meaning was that of means of achieving, accomplishing, as for instance the means for performing a journey.

But you may now be asking yourselves where’s doubt in those Greek words? To answer to your pertinent question I’ll have to introduce one other Greek word, formed with that same root por-. The word is porew, that means, carry, convey by land or water, traverse. So, what we have here is the implicit idea of a passage through which something is carried. Now, if you add the prefix ‘a’ you get aporew, that is, without means or resources (just like aporos) – in other words, that passage through which things were conveyed no longer exists, and that’s why the word means, of things, to be left wanting; and in general, to be at loss, be in doubt, be puzzled.

Let’s now go back to poros as the means of passing a river to add that we find this same meaning in Arabic root عبر (‘br), a thing by means of which one crosses a river (a boat, a bridge or some other thing) – but as it also means interpreting, explaining, or studying a thing, it is possible to assume that having a means of passing, or traversing, an obstacle such as a river is the same as having the means to study and thus understand what is not known. So, basically, doubt in aporew is referred to as the same as the lacking of means to carry or convey understanding.

As to poverty being associated with the lack of means to carry things through a passage… it suffices you to remember that what we call trade is strictly dependent on the possibility of using certain means to import or export goods, and that the lack of passages to the sea, for instance, is what fuels conflicts like the one between Ethiopia and Eritrea, the first of them being called a landlocked country, that is, a country that is not only cut off from sea resources, but also impeded of having access to seaborne trade. This same notion adopts one other aspect in the word embargo, that literally means to stay in the port, that is, the prohibition of ships to sail, thus impeding the conveyance of goods. More recently, embargos’ aim is to act as a barrier to the passage of all sorts of goods, thus weakening, and eventually, leading a country to poverty, as was the case of the embargo imposed by the United Nations Security Council on Iraq.

In the final part of this article, I’ll leave you with some other consequences of narrowness for you to think for yourselves

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

View the Original article

A journey through the nature of doubt in Latin, Greek and Arabic Languages – Part 3

on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

In the previous post, I’ve tried to show how shakin, one of the Arabic words for doubt, might be defining another kind of doubt, not the doubt that’s wavering in its indecision, but the kind of doubt that has gotten established in the mind – and to try and prove this I’ve mentioned ayat 157 of Quran’s chapter 4, in which we read “And [for] their saying, ‘Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.’ And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it.They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption.”

III Part – Hanging doubt

Let us now recall that doubt is also linked to lack of trust, and so being the case to be in doubt is also to suspect to be false what’s conveyed as being true. So, we now have to look at doubt as being equal to suspicion – and this is exactly what we find in the mentioned ayat, not only through shakin, as we have already seen, but also through the noun assumption, as we are going to see next.

Assumption comes as a translation of Arabic word Zani, whose root, ظن, means opinion, supposition or conjecture, that is, subjective knowledge based on things that are not known through ocular perception. Furthermore, this is also a root that puts conjecture side by side with being suspicious, which might makes us think that, like conjecture, suspicion is not based on things that one sees.

Nevertheless, and curiously enough, the word suspicion itself is built on the notion of looking up or upwards – this is what Latin suspicio clearly demonstrates. Moreover, as it could as well denote to look at secretly or askance, it has been possible for the verb to give origin to suspectus, that is, mistrusted, that excites suspicion. But still, things are not clear… one might ask as to what sort of relation was originally established in Latin language that allowed the word to associate looking upwards with the pair suspicion-doubt. In my opinion, the source of the association lies within the concept of suspense itself. We say of something that is suspended that it is hung, and this is, basically, the first meaning of Latin Verb suspendo. But as it also meant to cause to be suspended, the verb allowed the meaning to make uncertain or doubtful, which, in turn, made it possible to be used tropically to denote both what is uncertain, doubtful, and wavering, hesitating.

It is probable that these meanings originate in the idea that the slightest force applied to a thing that’s suspended will make it move back and forth – and we already know how this type of movement seems the ideal to symbolize the wavering of the doubting mind. But there’s something else about a thing’s being suspended… In my previous article, “Why was the Qu’ran revealed in Arabic?”, I’ve showed how the the notion of firmness is dependent on the existence of  a basis, a foundation whose roots lie under the surface. What I’m suggesting is that to things that are hung we attribute the opposite meaning, that is, a thing that is hanging is something that is essentially uncertain.

So, if suspicion begins with the mind’s looking upwards, and if what’s upwards is basically suspended, then the suspicious mind is in fact paying attention to things that are uncertain and doubtful, this meaning that hey are not themselves to be trusted.

In the fourth part of this analysis, I will try what doubt has to do with narrowness

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

View the Original article

A journey through the nature of doubt in Latin, Greek and Arabic Languages – Part 2

on

In the previous post, we’ve discovered that the act of doubting is in itself associated with the existence of two points that might work as a symbol of the mind’s lack of power to judge and choose accordingly.

II Part -Halting doubt

I am now going to narrate the part of my journey where I stopped to analyze one of the Arabic words that is used in the Qu’ran to convey the meaning to doubt. The word shakin is one of several built around the root شك (shk), that, in relation to a thing, affair, or case, denotes the quality of being dubious, and the act of doubting, wavering or vacillating in opinion.

But there was one other meaning in the root that caught my attention… an inconspicuous meaning that brought to my mind a verb that’s present in my native language… the meaning that, when applied to a camel, denotes he limped, halted, or had a slight lameness. Through Latin inheritance, Portuguese verb claudicar (derived from Latin claudico) gives testimony to this same association1, that is, to limp and, metaphorically, to vacillate. It all begins in claudus, whose meaning limping, halting, lame, was used metaphorically to name that which is imperfect, defective or untrustworthy. But there’s more to add to this… the fact that this adjective claudus describes the one who has suffered the effects of verb claudo, to close, shut up, confine – so that claudus properly means shut in, hampered.

In short, we are invited to look at doubt not only as an impediment to proceed but also as an enclosure where the mind is shut in, which in turn suggests that the wavering has stopped. So, are شك and claudico telling us of a special, distinct form of doubt that is not assimilated with wavering?; that is, on the contrary, associated with a cessation of motion?
Some of shakin‘s occurrences in the Qu’ran lead me to conclude that this Arabic root is not conveying the meaning of doubt as a wavering, a vacillation of the mind, but instead it’s defining this specific doubt as the one that’s already settled in the mind, as it is clearly perceptible in chapter 4, ayat 157: “And [for] their saying, ‘Indeed, we have killed the Messiah, Jesus, the son of Mary, the messenger of Allah.’ And they did not kill him, nor did they crucify him; but [another] was made to resemble him to them. And indeed, those who differ over it are in doubt about it. They have no knowledge of it except the following of assumption.”.

1Present in English as well through halt, to proceed or act with uncertainty or indecision; and to limp or hobble

In the next post, I will try to show how suspicion itself is not to be trusted by the same mind that has chosen it as an answer to doubt.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

View the Original article

A journey through the nature of doubt in Latin, Greek and Arabic Languages – part 1

on Monday, June 25, 2012

In this article you will be following a journey through the nature of doubt as seen by Latin, Greek and Arabic languages. During this journey, I will analyze some aspects of the concept and, whenever possible, they’ll brought to light with the help of the Qur’an.

I Part – Swinging doubt

As happiness, sorrow, grief, and pleasure, doubt is such an intrinsic part of our nature that no human creature is entitled to claim ignorance on what it feels to be in doubt. But the fact that is common to all of us, does not invalidate the need to understand it through reasoning; and as I try to avoid opinionism whenever possible, I will try to anatomize doubt with the help of words.

Having said that, the first think I want to show you is some simple definitions, taken from an English dictionary, that will serve as an introduction. So, to begin with, the noun doubt points to a lack of certainty, which makes it synonym with lack of trust, in which case doubt might be defined as one’s being suspicious about the truth, fact, or existence of something. In simple terms, to be in doubt can either show that one is uncertain on what to think about any given thing, or that one is tending to accept that, contrary to what others think, any given thing is actually false.

When looked at as a verb, doubt shows us that one of its consequences is to lead to an irresolution as on which of two or more possible alternatives, or courses, of action to choose. In relation to this irresoluteness we may also say that the mind vacillates or wavers… that is, it swings back and forth from one point to another without being able to make a decision… A bit like something that is hanging in the air, balancing between two points; and although there might be things that are nice to be looked at while balancing, like, for instance the tightrope-walker, I’m sure that nobody enjoys having that rather unnerving movement in one’s own mind.

Now we have a very powerful image to represent, or give shape to the act of doubting: the image of a tedious moving between two points that never change, as if one was always following the same way, back and forth, without getting, or seeing anything new – a monotonous landscape, indeed. And now that I’m making doubting equivalent to the useless treading of the same way back and forth, I remembered something very interesting: Latin verb dubito, from which doubt derived, literally means going two (from duo, two; and bito, to go on foot, walk) and, in general, to waver in opinion or judgment, to be irresolute, to hesitate. In other words, the concept of doubt itself is founded on the premise of the existence of two points of seemingly equal importance, that do not allow the mind to judge between them and therefore be able to choose.

In the second part of this article I will examine the Arabic root شك in general, and its meaning of doubt (shakin) in particular, to see if there’s a a connection between  the Latin and the Arabic concept of doubt.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

View the Original article