Showing posts with label still. Show all posts
Showing posts with label still. Show all posts

Boston Art Theft: FBI still fumbles over case details of the $500m theft

on Saturday, March 23, 2013

The heist:

The cheerful St. Patrick’s Day on March 18th 1990 at Boston saw everybody completely occupied with the green festival of the masses, completely oblivious to a dark plan taking shape and being implemented – a task that is going to leave Boston scarred with a great loss.

The Isabella Stewart Gardner museum was approached by two unwelcomed police officers in its 4-storeyed grandeur that held some of the greatest treasures of art. The police officers forced their way in with the authority that their uniforms gave them and hand cuffed the two guards inside the building under grounds of suspicion. The police officers were thieves in disguise; their motive would not have been too difficult to understand given that they were standing in the compounds of a museum holding many priceless art works.

The lost works:

The thieves quickly paved their way through 13 pieces of art in about 81 minutes including many 4 Rembrandts. To any art-lover this count would be enough to force a tear drop. However, more than the loss of precious art, this theft which accounted to an estimated loss of $500m is also officially the greatest property theft till date. Empty frames still hang in the Gardner museum as a sad reminder of the loss but also as a hopeful placeholder for the return on the works.

The Quest:

The news of the great loss did not take time to trigger investigations to be branched out towards every possible corner. Though the progress of these investigations had been put to several pit falls, and hindrances due to several internal matters; however, the search continued and is claimed to be fast-paced.

Over the last few years, the FBI has short listed on many places. FBI’s Richard DesLauriers confirmed that the agency believes the theft to be conducted by a criminal organization from New England and the Mid Atlantic States. Authorities are also said to believe that the art works were later taken to Connecticut and Philadelphia years after the theft, and there were attempts of sale, successful or unsuccessful, that were made in Philadelphia about a decade ago.

Carmen Ortiz, a US attorney, confirmed that as the statute of limitations has expired the accused will be facing full charges, but she signalled towards potential immunity deals to retrieve the art.

The Fumble:

As is expected and needed from mass media, press of all kinds have been hovering above every authority in charge of the case. DesLauriers have been constantly dodging all questions of identity of the thieves as he believes any revelation of this kind can delay the investigation further.

Last year, a Connecticut man – Robert Gentile – was reportedly under suspicious eyes for the crime but later he pleaded guilty for a weapons and prescription drugs case. His lawyer confirmed that Gentile testified of having no connection to the theft but only certain acquaintances which that authorities suspect as accused.

FBI now reveals that they have finally solved the mystery of who stole the art work but to many a disappointment, they are still not disclosing the information. This leads to more speculations and a scope of further twists and turns to the already daunting theft at Isabella Stewart Gardner museum located in Boston.



View the
Original article

Islamification of USA still some way off: Gallup poll finds 77% of Americans are Christian, 0.6% Muslim

on Thursday, December 27, 2012

America is largely a Christian nation with 77 percent of adults identifying themselves as Christian, according to a Gallup survey, while only 0.6 percent identified as Muslim.

"The United States remains a largely Christian nation; more than 9 in 10 Americans who have a religious identity are affiliated with a Christian religion," reported Gallup on Dec. 24. "There has been little change in this portrait of religious identity in the U.S. from last year."

Gallup interviewed more than 326,000 Americans between January and November 2012 and found that 77.3 percent identified with a Christian faith: 51.9 percent Protestant/Other Christian; 23.3 percent Catholic; and 2.1 percent Mormon.

Another 1.7 percent identified as Jewish; 0.6 percent identified as Muslim; and 2.6 percent as "Other/non-Christian."

The number of American adults who said they had no religious identity was up over last year, from 15.0 percent to 15.6 percent.

CNSNews.com, 26 December 2012

This is the same CNSNews.com that published a comment piece in 2010 titled "Is Obama a Muslim?" It concluded that while the president was not in fact a Muslim he might just as well have been, since "he does support the islamification of America that is taking place".



View the Original article

YouTube Still Blocked in Pakistan

on Thursday, December 6, 2012

A few months back when anti-Islamic video was posted on YouTube and even after the protests from the Muslims of all over the world, YouTube did not remove the videos. Muslims made special requests as their feelings were badly hurt. Though the video “The innocence of Muslims” breached the terms and conditions of YouTube but still it was not removed for some reasons. Therefore, the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) came into action and blocked the YouTube in Pakistan. The access was completely blocked in Pakistan and the message “This site is restricted by your service provider” was displayed.

Though people appreciated the step taken by the government but still there were people who used black hat techniques to gain the access. The most common method was the use of a Hot Spot shield. Apart from this some used proxy to access YouTube here in Pakistan. Though it was a good positive step taken by the government but it had created problems for the people who used to access YouTube for some constructive purpose apart from entertainment.

There were various rumors regarding the availability of the YouTube in Pakistan. It was found that some people had an access to YouTube using the Internet connection of private companies therefore PTA ordered every Internet providing companies to block YouTube completely. Hence, following the orders of PTA even the private companies blocked an access to YouTube.

However, some people claimed that YouTube will be back on December 1, 2012. Therefore, people were anxiously waiting for December 1, 2012 when they could finally taste the YouTube once again. Nonetheless, the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority replied back saying that these are just rumors and hold no ground. Actually they are right on this as the authorities of the YouTube have not met the requirements of Pakistan yet.

According to the official, the world’s most famous video sharing website has failed to meet the requirements and demands of the government of Pakistan. They have still not removed the inappropriate content from the website which is the main cause of the issue. The video published on the YouTube is hurting the feelings of the people Pakistan hence they won’t allow YouTube to continue its services.

Even the Telecommunication Ministry has said that the YouTube has not unblocked yet and they do not have any plans until and unless they meet the demands of the Pakistan government. However, in the month of November YouTube became accessible to the three top mobile operators of Pakistan. This is still in consideration and there are chances that the government might even block the access for those mobile operators as well. We just have to wait and watch.

In the nutshell, it is a good step taken by the government. Some had to take the stand and this time it is the government of Pakistan. Being a Pakistani I am proud to that finally my government has taken a step for some good cause. Stick with me and I shall bring some new interesting news regarding YouTube.



View the
Original article

Walthamstow: EDL 'will still hold protest' despite ban threat

on Wednesday, October 24, 2012

The far-right English Defence League (EDL) and counter protesters say they will still demonstrate in Walthamstow this weekend despite police attempts to ban all marches.

The Met Police announced yesterday (Tuesday October 23) it had applied to the Home Secretary to prohibit marches and processions in east London after receiving intelligence that there could be "serious public disorder, violence and damage".

The government is yet to make a decision but it is expected they will agree.

However the EDL said on its website it will hold a static protest instead to get around a ban and has urged supporters to descend on Walthamstow this Saturday (October 27).

Counter protest groups Unite Against Fascism (UAF) and We Are Waltham Forest have both said they will also hold a static protest in Walthamstow town centre.

A council-organised community funday celebrating the borough's diversity is still scheduled to go ahead on Saturday in Walthamstow town centre.

Waltham Forest Guardian, 24 October 2012

See also Murad Qureshi's blog, 24 October 2012



View the Original article

Case against Warsi's Pakistan trip collapses – but Cameron may still remove her as Tory party chairman

on Thursday, June 28, 2012

The vicious campaign against Tory Party co-chairman Sayeeda Warsi, led by the Sunday Telegraph and backed by the Labour Party (see herehere and here), has suffered a setback.

The BBC reports that Warsi has been cleared of any serious breach of the ministerial code over an official trip to Pakistan. The prime minister's adviser Sir Alex Allan found she had committed only a "minor" breach for failing to declare she had been accompanied on the trip by her business partner Abid Hussain, with whom she had set up a restaurant supply company called Rupert's Recipes.

In his report, Sir Alex said: "Baroness Warsi has accepted that she should have made officials aware of her business relationship with Mr Hussain, and has apologised for the oversight. But, as she says, this was not a trade-related visit; Rupert's Recipes does not do any business in Pakistan and there was no financial benefit to either Baroness Warsi or Mr Hussain; Mr Hussain was not a member of the official delegation, no part of his travel or other costs were met by the British government, and no arrangements were made by her office or the British High Commission for Mr Hussain to meet leading politicians."

He added: "I am satisfied that, had she declared her business relationship, that would not have been seen as a barrier to Mr Hussain helping to organise the visit. Nonetheless, she should have been more aware of the perception of a conflict of interest, and the potential criticism which could arise."

Sir Alex advised the prime minister: "Any action you decide to take in the light of the facts of this case is of course a matter for you, but I record my view that the breach of the code was a minor one, and that Baroness Warsi did not use her office for personal financial gain."

In a statement Warsi said: "I have always maintained that I have never misused my ministerial office for personal or financial gain. The allegations on this matter were untrue and unsubstantiated, and I am pleased that Sir Alex Allan's report has confirmed that."

Nobody acquainted with the facts of the case could have believed that Allan's investigation would reach any other conclusion. Warsi's opponents must have known that. Their aim, however, has been to create enough controversy around her that it will be impossible for David Cameron to keep her on as Tory Party co-chairman.

They may still succeed. Despite the fact that Warsi has been cleared of any wrongdoing over the Pakistan trip, the Daily Mail reports that Cameron has "hinted he may move her to a different post".



View the Original article