Who are the real Muslims? Are they the once who follow the Islamic doctrines, practice sharia and are honest to the real way of living of the Muslims? It is high time you should get some senses knocked into your head. Understand that there is a very big difference between the real Muslims and the so called Muslims who have continued for a long period of time to taint the image of the true worship of Allah! No relationship whatsoever between the fake and the true Islamic religion. In fact the fake Muslims are an exact copy of a bad script where on the other side, you get a good and a learn picture of a good script- the true Muslims.

Firstly, the atheist, Christians, Hindus, among other religions should understand that Allah is the true God of Muslims, Prophet Muhammad the true prophet of Allah, and the Quran is the Islamic religious text. The 3, Allah, prophet and Quran, sets a very good platform that defines who a true Muslim is, and not some vague explanation that is meant to portray a bad picture. God himself sent Prophet Muhammad with messages and the religious texts that give a clear explanation of how a Muslim is supposed to live his or her life. And that is the exact thing that is taught in the mosque and other Muslims places of worship by the Muslim religious leaders such as the sheikhs and the imam’s.

On the other hand, there is the category of those who would like themselves to get associated with Islamic religion or those who have deflected or claims to be converts of other religions. They are the mastermind of the bad notion that has filled the whole world. Is there any single time that Allah instructed his people to kill others, shed innocent blood and participate in suicide bombing? Not even a single day! And unfortunately that is what the world has been cheated to believe, that those are no any better than a terrorist, a ruthless killer! Woe unto those who have such beliefs. As a person who is civilized, do not be cheated into taking to account that Muslims are bad people. The terrorists and so like-minded people are the projects of the evil one, the destructor who does not have the love of people in their heart. That is not a true Muslim, he is the fake one!

Did God himself not tell people to have love for humanity? What has been the message from the prophet of Allah? Is it not the work of compassion? What does the Quran have for the Muslims? Not a message of bombing, killing, abduction, rape and spreading of wrong information about others. Lack of fear of Allah by the fake Muslims is what triggers the culprits to behave in that manner. A true Muslim is aimed at seeing paradise. You cannot be a paradise candidate in your fake Muslim mind. Change for the better. True Muslims have love for all, they follow Allah’s teachings!

About the author

View the Original article

The fundamental differences between Quran and Bible are on the basis of faith and practices in both religions. The manuscript of Bible has been written by many authors as compared to Quran in which the writings show that it is an account made by God Himself. Quran is a complete book and Bible consists of 66 small books from which 18 books consist of signs of their origins because they were reveled upon some Prophet but other books had no claims to their origin. No self referencing is seen in Bible because the word “Bible” has not been used in it on the other hand Quran consists of self referencing. There are many miracles prophecies mentioned in Bible in contrast there are no miracles record because Quran is a miracle itself.

Although Quran accepts that Torah and Gospel both are the books reveled upon different Prophets but at the same time the concept of crucification of Jesus is not stated in it. According to Quran Jesus did not rise from the dead in contrast to Bible. The concept that Jesus was the begotten son of God is also a misconception that is found in Bible but not in Quran. Quran depicts oneness of Allah and accepts Jesus (PBUH) as His prophet. There is no son, no parents and no one equal to God. Bible also teaches the concept of Trinity which is understood as the father (God), the son (Jesus), and Mary.  Bible depicts that man is considered as a sinner and needs salvation which can only be achieved through faith as compared to Quran which states that man is born good not evil and if one want to achieve salvation than it can be  achieved through hard work and sincerity.

Besides these differences there are many other small differences between Quran and Bible. Some differences are based on historical facts rather than being doctrinal in nature. According to Quran Prophet Noah managed to escape the flood and his son was drowned in the flood but according to Bible Prophet Noah had managed to escape the flood with his wife, his three sons and their wives. The differences between Quran and Bible are found in their worst scenarios about Prophet Mosses. According to Quran Prophet Mosses was adopted by Pharoah’s wife but according to Bible he was adopted by Pharoah’s daughter.

Other differences between Quran and Bible are Muslims belief according to Quran that Prophet Ibrahim was offered at the altar by Abraham but Christians believe according to Bible that Prophet Isaac was offered at the altar. Eid-ul-Adha is celebrated by the Muslims on the basis of Quranic Surah where it is mentioned that after sacrificing the animal, only the dedication or godliness shall reach Allah not the blood or flesh of the animal. Bible on the other hand provides another view and it is stated that those families will escape from the judgment of God which apply the blood of sacrificial animal on the doorpost of their homes.

About the author

Osama

I am 20 years old from Karachi, Pakistan. I am doing graduation from Karachi University. Right now, doing freelance writing for Muslim Academy.

View the Original article

Happier times: Alan Lake and Roberta MooreRichard Bartholomew points out that the 4 Freedoms Community website run by former English Defence League financier and ideologist Alan Ayling ("Alan Lake") has updated its Code of Conduct.

Under the heading "Unlawful Killing" this now includes the following: "You must not endorse or encourage people to perform criminal executions. However, you can endorse enforcement of execution by the state (capital punishment) after application of due judicial process."

The latter qualification is to cover Ayling himself, who has in the past advocated the execution of political opponents like Rowan Williams, David Cameron and Nick Clegg. Still, as long Ayling states that their killing should take place after "application of due judicial process" nobody could reasonably object to that, could they? Well, Ayling's employers, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, evidently did. At the end of last year they suspended him from his job after his identity was revealed.

The ban on endorsing or encouraging "criminal executions", as distinct from the sort of executions Ayling himself advocates, was imposed after he was contacted by the Norwegian paper Dagbladet in connection with a comment posted on the 4 Freedoms site by Roberta Moore, the former leader of the EDL Jewish division who now heads the Jewish Defence League UK.

Expressing her regret that Anders Breivik had failed to kill Eskil Pedersen, the leader of the Norwegian Labour Party's youth section who escaped from Utøya by boat, Moore wrote: "It seems Breivik missed one. This is precisely the coward that should have been killed. Cowards can run but eventually they meet their fate. May KARMA play its part now."

Five years ago four Muslim extremists were jailed for four to six years after being convicted of soliciting to murder because they chanted slogans such as "bomb, bomb, Denmark", "bomb, bomb the UK", "7/7 on its way" and "Europe, you will pay with your blood" at a protest in London against the Jyllands-Posten anti-Islam cartoons.

The Director of Public Prosecutions said at the time: "Terrorism attacks our way of life and incitement can make a very real contribution to it. We shall continue to take incitement very seriously and prosecute it robustly where there is enough evidence for us to do so."

Why, then, has Roberta Moore not been charged with the same offence?

Moore is not the only member of the Jewish Defence League UK to advocate terrorist violence against their political opponents. Another is Rob Sims, who posted the following comment on the EDL's official Facebook page in response to Breivik's trial:

"We should be supporting this guy, The lot he killed where a bunch of Anti-Semite scum, These left wing idiots and muslims are making europe resemble Germany under NSDAP rule, Whats it gonna take for people to realise that we need more people like Breivik who are willing to actually fight for what he believes in."

So far as we know no action has been taken against Sims either, even though Durham Constabulary has been notified.

If the police and Crown Prosecution Service can find the resources to prosecute a Muslim teenager for posting offensive online comments about British troops, why aren't the likes of Moore and Sims in court too?

View the Original article