Showing posts with label conflicts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label conflicts. Show all posts

Muslim conflicts within Myanmar

on Saturday, November 24, 2012

Everyone has heard of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Perhaps, the most politicized territorial dispute in modern history, this conflict provides the ubiquitous imagery that fuels human rights activism in the West, and anti-Zionist/Western zealotry in the Muslim world. The cross-fire between HAMAS and Israel today will no doubt be referenced by people on both sides of the debate as proof that their ideological position is even more right than it was yesterday. And back-and-forth it will go, for tomorrow, and for the foreseeable future.

There are many unfortunate aspects of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Not least of which is how it distracts us from other conflicts and unfortunate conditions elsewhere. In terms of its casualties, this conflict is tragic, but it is not the largest ongoing conflict involving Muslims, nor is Gaza or the West Bank where Muslim communities are being most heavily persecuted or denied Human Rights. In other parts of the world, outside of the Middle East, there are dire conditions and conflict zones where innocent people, many of them Muslims, are not only being denied Human Rights, but are dying in large numbers, without anyone seeming to notice or to care.

Myanmar, or Burma, is one of these places. In the past 6 months alone, thousands of homes have been destroyed, tens of thousands of people have been displaced, and hundreds have been killed as a result of inter-ethnic conflict targeted against Myanmar’s Muslim populations.

A medium-sized country in Southeast Asia, Myanmar is home to more than 135 distinct ethnic groups. Buddhism dominates there, having first been introduced nearly two millennium ago by Indian merchants. Further, from as early as the 7th century C.E. (1st century A.H.) Islam has also been present in Myanmar, having either arrived via Muslim sea-merchants or traveling Sufis. But unlike in other areas of Southeast Asia, Islam was not readily adopted by the people of Myanmar because they were already avowed Buddhists.

Today, Muslims comprise about 13% of the population of Myanmar. However, in the last census, the government reported them as only 4%. This is in-part political strategy, a way for rulers to minimize minority opinions that may pose a risk to the status quo. But, there is also an even more blatant rationale: disapproval of the Muslim presence.

To be sure, there are deeply-rooted historical discrepancies between the various ethnic groups of Myanmar, not least of which, at a macro-level, is Buddhist-Muslim conflict. In the modern era, this conflict intensified during World War II, when during the Japanese invasion of Burma (Myanmar), the Muslim populations opposed the popular opinion toward independence, and instead showed loyalty to the opposing British forces. Soon after, these same Muslims sought the annexation of southwest Burma into Bangladesh (then East Pakistan), further angering the majority-Buddhist Burmese nationalists. And so, like the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict, the genesis of the Buddhist-Muslim conflict in Myanmar is political, NOT religious.

Today, Muslim populations in Myanmar are severely mistreated. They are being excluded from not only political power, but the surrounding economy has essentially closed its doors to Muslim customers. Doing business with Muslims is socially punishable, and as a result starvation and related health-problems amongst Muslim populations is rampant.

Myanmar is a country transitioning from dictatorship to democracy. The government, once ruled exclusively by privileged military elites, is now starting to give way to civilian parliamentarians. As part of the new United States foreign policy strategy under the Obama Administration, which is refocusing U.S. efforts away from the Middle East and toward South and Southeast Asia, in light of China’s ascendence, President Obama recently visited Myanmar to acknowledge how far it has come, as well as how far it still yet has to go.

The ongoing inter-ethnic conflict with majority Muslim casualties was a focal point of the President’s message to the country, as he urged Burmese people of all backgrounds “to find strength in their diversity.”

More news is certainly to come from Myanmar in the near future. For the present, though, we can start by acknowledging that Israel-Palestine, however unfortunate, is not the only ongoing conflict involving Muslims, and that there are other dire conditions elsewhere that demand our immediate attention.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/burmas-muslims-lose-homes-and-hope/2012/11/15/0aa5cfe4-2ea2-11e2-beb2-4b4cf5087636_gallery.html?hpid=z13



View the
Original article

Beirut Lebanon, conflicts with Syria rise

on Monday, October 29, 2012

The tensions between Sunni and Shiite Muslims are still prevailing in Lebanon. The Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah has been in support with the Syrian government, this has made The Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah face many problems inside Lebanon and with the Syrian government as well.

The Lebanese Shiite group Hezbollah has given many open signs of its sympathy towards the Syrian government over the past many months. The major sign came forth after the car bomb blast that killed Lebanese Maj. Gen. Wissam al-Hassan, a Lebanese intelligence chief aligned with the Sunni-led bloc that is opposed to the government of President Bashar al-Assad. Hezbollah kept denying these accusations as it had no link or intention in turning down the Lebanese Maj. Gen. Wissam al-Hassan, a Lebanese intelligence chief aligned.

Hezbollah’s closet political allies such as Druze leader Walid Jumblatt, have turned their backs towards Hezbollah after they found out that Hezbollah has close ties with the Syrian government, and had a major role in the car bomb blast that killed Lebanese Maj. Gen. Wissam al-Hassan, a Lebanese intelligence chief aligned with the Sunni-led bloc that is opposed to the government of President Bashar al-Assad.

Hezbollah commands a well-trained armed militia; moreover, it also has a political party in the country with members in parliament. It’s well trained militia is a fighting force around the country mainly known as a Shiite Muslim group as well.  Hezbollah maintained a low profile, even when an enraged Sunni gunmen hit the streets of Beirut after Hassan’s funeral.

It was a particularly muted response from a bombastic group.

“You know how we find out that Hezbollah is under pressure?” asked Hilal Khashan, a professor in the political science department at the American University of Beirut. “They remain quiet. They are keeping a very low profile during these days. There is already pressure on Hezbollah and the pressure is mounting.”

Since the beginning of the crisis in Syria last year, Hezbollah has been in a bind. The group presents itself as the champion of the downtrodden, but as the conflict next door got bloodier and bloodier, with thousands dying, the group could not back down from its support for Assad.

“Hezbollah right now is facing an existential threat in Syria,” Khashan said.

Syria has not only given Hezbollah steadfast political support, but Syrian territory has also been used to send rockets and conventional arms overland to Hezbollah fighters in Lebanon. If the Assad regime goes, Hezbollah would lose its primary logistical chain for arms, leaving it isolated in the event of any conflict with Israel.’ (WP, conflict, 28)

Many believe that the Hezbollah group has been targeted from the day of its inception in Lebanon, but some also say that Hezbollah remains under pressure from the Syrian government and it can’t openly accept or deny its support and sympathy for the Syrian government.

The revelation of Hezbollah has come forth after the Hassan‘s murder, and the country has developed a suspicious attitude against Hezbollah for its involvements with the Syrian government

 



View the
Original article