Showing posts with label bring. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bring. Show all posts

LET’S BRING A CHANGE-STARTING BY CHANGING OURSELVES

on Thursday, April 18, 2013

“Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.” Leo Tols

Mostly, it is observed that about 95% of the people try to change the world and only 5% try to change themselves. Changing ourselves can change the world, we can change the world up to an extent, to which we can change ourselves because we all are parts of it. Similarly, the law of radiations and vibrations which states that we can send out our affects to another and the vibrations of others can affect us. These affect can’t be ignored.

It is very well said, that a single drop of water can turn into an ocean.

But the question arises why should I change myself when I am comfortable the way I am? The simple answer to this fair question is; nothing is perfect in this world. Perfection is a static state which needs nothing more to be done. May be after death, we need nothing more.

We can change ourselves by changing our brains. Recent researches reveal that our brain is a highly programmable system and its programming starts in the mother’s womb. The present environment can alter our behaviors and similarly our presence can affect our surroundings.

On a busy road, stop your car and let the old women cross. This way you bring change by doing small things. I assure you none of us is as busy as to spare a minute for such minute changes.

These changes will make us alive. The time you fall down, open up your eyes and challenge yourself to get up. Always keep your hope alive. Hope this will help you to provide strength to rework and re-travel to the areas which you thought would never need to be revisited.

We can take few steps to our journey to a more fulfilling life. The first step is that one should develop a desire to change himself. The second step is authenticity, this can give us a life which is free from lies, anxieties and fears. The other one is pure awareness, which is able to open the windows to our soul, which can throw all bad thoughts and emotions away under the bright light. We need to develop acceptance and compassion, which can actually help us to re-program ourselves regarding a peculiar situation. Expanded horizons can diminish our all unwanted emotions. We can learn from our previous experiences, how to work and set yourselves to existence.

My emphasis, life is no magic.

We should not cry in fear; rather we should try harder to bring a revolution with our consciousness. Only then a mutual hope and a thought will arise which will certainly bring a change that is needed to be brought. Do you remember the Mother Teresa quote? She said:

If everyone only cleaned their own doorstep, the whole world would be cleaned.

We should work hard with perspiration and determination and don’t let our dreams and determinations expire. Let us live our lives to bring a change and be the change.



View the
Original article

Bachmann claims Obama administration has embraced plan to bring Islamic law to U.S.

on Thursday, December 13, 2012

U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann says President Barack Obama's administration has embraced what she calls a bid by Islamic fundamentalists to bring the U.S. government in line with Islamic law.

Bachmann, R-Stillwater, made the comments last weekend in an interview with Jan Markell, a Maple Grove-based Christian minister with Olive Tree Ministries.

Bachmann created national controversy earlier this year by claiming the Muslim Brotherhood, an Islamist fundamentalist movement that rose to power in Egypt, had penetrated the U.S. government.

In the latest interview, Bachmann warns of a 10-year plan crafted by the Organization for Islamic Cooperation, which includes 57 nations, most of them in the Middle East. Bachmann, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, says the OIC plan aims "to criminalize worldwide any speech that is disparaging of Islam" in accordance with Sharia law.

What she describes as a "purge" by FBI and other Obama administration officials of materials deemed offensive to Islam shows the administration is "embracing" the OIC plan, Bachmann said.

"That's what I spent my whole year doing, was talking about this issue of what the OIC was trying to do with their 10-year plan and all of these efforts in the Obama administration," Bachmann said. "The only conclusion you could make is that they are embracing the 10-year plan and are supporting it."

St Cloud Times, 12 December 2012

See also "Bachmann: Obama wants to 'lift up the Islamists' and impose Sharia law", Right Wing Watch, 12 December 2012

The interview was broadcast on Jan Markell's weekly radio show, which has the stated purpose of "discussing current events in the light of biblical end-time prophecy". As Mother Jones has reported, Bachmann's association with Markell and the Christian-Zionist Olive Tree Ministries goes back some years.



View the Original article

Did the Quran Bring Math to Us?

on Saturday, October 13, 2012

There are many discoveries in modern times that scientists have found to be very rare. It turns out that most of these rare discoveries have been available in the Holy Quran that has been around a very long time ago!

Should I remind you that the numbers you use (1,2,3, … ) are Arabic? Algebra, Algorithm, and many other mathematical words are also Arabic. If you like Math and Science, you should thank the Qur’an for bringing them to you, because there is no other scripture that has given to science more than the Qur’an did.

Let us investigate these claims.

The Arabic numerals are more properly called Hindu-Arabic numerals because they did not originate in Arabia but originated with the Hindus as early as 200 B.C. The system was adopted by the Arabs by about A.D. 800 at the very earliest. They brought it to Spain about 900. It was brought to the rest of Europe about 1100…

Very few Arabs at the time of Mohammad could read or write or know arithmetics. Mohammad himself said we are a nation that does not know how to write or to do arithmetics (nahnu ‘omah la takteb wa la tahseb).

It is the Jewish prisoners of war in early Islam that taught the early Muslims how to read and write etc. and in return they received their freedom.

The Arabs used the local tradesmen, architects and scholars of the conquered countries and learned their skills from them. The scientific measure of the Arabs at the time of Mohammad is best reflected in the Hadith and the Qur’an.

After this quick overview let us now be more specific in regard to the above claims:

 Should I remind you that the numbers you use (1,2,3, …) are Arabic.

They arabic symbols for the digits do look different from the Western way of writing them. Just look at the verse numbers in an Arabic Qur’an. The way of writing them (i.e. the symbols themself) are obivously not the same, so they are not “Arabic”, therefore I guess the claim refers probably to the way of manipulating them, i.e. the positional number system. (The Greeks and Hebrews had signs for numbers long before the Arabs.) Assuming the positional number system is meant and not the symbols for the digits, I have to sadly pop this illusion as well since even that is not from the Arabs as we will see below in greater detail.

 Algebra, Algorithm, and many other mathematical words are also Arabic.

Algebra and Algorithm, I agree. But I am not so sure if you can add “MANY others” to this list as claimed. (But then exaggeration is a very Arabic thing also.)

 If you like Math and Science, You should thank the Qur’an for bringing them to you, because there is no other scripture that has given to Science more than the Qur’an did.

Would you mind showing us where exactly the Qur’an did bring math to us? I have not found that yet. Please quote exact passages which explain those mathematical concepts you seem to allude to.

The Arabs kept learning from the local scholars until they began to reinterpret the Qur’an. But thank God for a man called Ghazali he squashed the new approach and put Islamic thinking hundred of years back because the new approach contradicted the hadith. If it was not for Imam Ghazali the Muslims not the Americans would have been the technological masters of this planet.

The words Algebra and Algorithm come from the Arabic, no question. But e.g. the word Arithmetics comes from the Greek word Arithmos meaning number. So, there are terms coming from one language and other terms coming from other languages, then what exactly are we to conclude from this? Also ponder this one: The word “computer” is English and that is used all over the world even though the first computers were built by the German engineer Konrad Zuse between 1930 and 1942. But it was the Americans who first built them on a large scale and distributed them, so that the English word became the standard word used for it in many languages.

In a similar way, the Arabs have taken over the work others have done [the Greeks and the Indians] and mainly have disseminated it and the Arabic name for it has stuck.

The positional number system was developed fully by the Hindu Indians in the 4th-6th century and adapted by the Arabs only in the 9-10th century. [Encyclopædia Britannica] Somehow many people still believe it was the Arabs who invented it while they only made it known world wide after they have taken it over from the Hindus. There is even a public inscription using the positional number system in India from the year 576, which shows that by this time it was in public use and not only used by the scholars in their studies. And you know that 576 is before the revelation of the Qur’an.

Let me quote in excerpts from Carl B. Boyer, “History of Mathematics”, (a standard reference book):

 During the first century of the Arabic conquests there had been political and intellectual confusion, … The Arabs were at first without intellectual interest, and they had little culture, beyond a language, toimpose on the peoples they conquered. … But by 750 the Arabs were ready to have history repeat itself, for the conquereors became eager to absorb the learning of the civilizations they had overrun. by 766 we learn that an astronomical-mathematical work, known to the Arabs as the “Sindhind”, was brought to Baghdad from India. … A few years later, perhaps about 775, the Siddhanta was translated into Arabic, and it was not long afterward (ca. 780) that Ptolemy’s astrological “Tetrabiblos” was translated into Arabic from the Greek …

The first century of the Muslim empire had been devoid of scientific achievement. This period (from about 650 – 750) had been, in fact, perhaps the nadir in the development of mathematics, for the Arabs had not yet achieved intellectual drive, and concern for learning in the other parts of the world had pretty much faded. Had it not been for the sudden cultural awakening in Islam during the second half of the eighth centrury, considerably more of the ancient science and mathematics would have been lost. To Baghdad at that time were called scholars from Syria, Iran, and Mesopotamia, including Jews and Nestorian Christians; under three great Abbasid patrons of learning — al-Mansur, Haroun al-Rashid, and al-Mamun — the city became a new Alexandria. During the reign of the second of these calliphs, … , part of Euclid was translated. …
Mohammed ibn-Musa al-Khwarizmi, …, who died sometime before 850, wrote more than a half dozen astronomical and mathematical works, of which the earliest were probably based on the Sindhind derived from India. Besides … [he] wrote two books on arithmetic and algebra which played very important roles in the history of mathematics. … In this work, based presumably on an Arabic translatoin of Brahmagupta, al-Khwarizmi gave so full an account of the Hindu numerals that he probably is responsible for the widespread but false impression that our system of numeration is Arabic in origin. Al-Khwarizmi made no claim to originality in connection with the system, the Hindu source if which he assumed as a matter of course; …

Through his arithmetic, al-Khwarizmi’s name has become a common English word; through the title of his most important book, Al-jabr wa’l muqabalah, he has supplied us with an even more popular household term. From this title has come the word “algebra”, for it is from this book that Europe later learned the branch of mathematics bearing this name. Diophantus sometimes is called “the father of algebra”, but this title more appropriately belongs to al-Khwarizmi. It is true that in two respects the work of al-Khwarizmi represented a retrogression from that of Diaophantus. First, it is on a far more elementary level than that found in the Diophantine problems and, second, the algebra of al-Khwarizmi is thoroughly retorical, with none of the syncopation found in the Greek Arthmetica or in Brahmagupta’s work. Even numbers were written out in words rather than symbols! It is quite unlikely that al-Khwarizmi knew of the work of Diophantus, but he must have been familiar with at least the astronomical and computational portions of Brahmagupta; yet neither al-Khwarizmi nor other Arabic scolars made use of syncopation or of negative numbers …

About the author



View the Original article

What steps should be taken to bring harmony among religions

on Wednesday, September 26, 2012

Everyone is aware of the word religion, but can anyone explain the exact definition of it? Religion is an extremely motivating force that motivates its followers. Religion is not limited to rituals and festivals. It is a mechanism that shows it followers the right way to live. Religion means laws, both moral and social that encourage the right way of living.

Humans are the only creation that have the power of transforming ideas, information and knowledge from one generation to another. That is how history is developed and civilizations are evolved. Today, when everyone is busy in a rat race of exceeding each other, and the world is at the verge of atomic destruction, religious harmony is the only solution. Religious harmony is the only way in which people around the world will be at peace and harmony with each other.  Every person has deep emotional roots with their religion. No matter what your religion is, you love and respect it and want it to be respected by others.

Human beings have been created equal and should not be discriminated against on any basis. In order to keep peace in the world, we all should make an effort to look into each others’ religion and find what is common between them. When this happens, we will be able to understand the basics of each belief and gain a sense of respect and dignity. When each religious group receives respect, they will ultimately agree to compromise, and a sense of universal brotherhood can be developed.

Prophets, saints and sages have appeared in different corners of the world in different ages. All of them have spread the message of love and peace. The government of every country should put their efforts toward bringing the people of different religions closer to each other. Peace and harmony acts have been passed, and many conferences have been held in many countries with the intention of promoting harmony and peace among different religions. If we can keep up with these, and the governments of every country take steps to protect every religion and its people, peace and harmony can be granted to everyone.

 


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

About the author



View the Original article

Police fail to bring charges against far-right activists

on Thursday, September 20, 2012

Five men arrested in dawn raids by counter-terrorism officers on suspicion of posting race hate material will not face any charges, The Northern Echo can reveal.

The suspects – including two men from the North-East – were detained in April when dozens of plain-clothed and uniformed officers swooped on several addresses across the UK. Computers, laptops and mobile phones were seized during the operation.

But last night, the North-East Counter Terrorism Unit revealed that, following discussions with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), it had been decided no charges would be brought.

Paul Duffy, 46, a former regional organiser of the English Defence League (EDL), was arrested in Elgin Avenue, Seaham , County Durham, on suspicion of public order offences on April 19. Darren Yateley, 43 was arrested in Shrewsbury Drive, Backworth, North Tyneside, for the same offences.

Both were believed at the time to be linked to the North-East Infidels, a breakaway organisation from the EDL, whose Facebook page described itself as an alliance of "right-wing nationalists, patriotic and loyalist groups from different parts of the UK".

An 18-year-old man from Merseyside, a 21-year-old man from Barnsley, South Yorkshire, and a 56-year-old man from Holloway, London, were also arrested. And an address in Knaresborough, North Yorkshire, was searched.

All the suspects were released on police bail, pending further inquiries.

A spokesman for the North-East Counter Terrorism Unit said last night: "Officers carried out a full and thorough investigation into posts made on social networking sites. Five men were arrested on suspicion of publishing or distributing written material which may stir up racial hatred. Following liaison with the CPS, we were advised that no further action should be taken."

A spokesman for the CPS said: "We did not get to the stage where we were provided with evidence to review or asked for a charging decision – so there was no decision not to charge, as it were. We were informed that the police were investigating the matter and then they informed us they had decided to close the investigation. We were made aware, which is entirely normal with cases of that nature."

Northern Echo, 20 September 2012

Note how differently Azhar Ahmed was treated over his offensive Facebook comments. After the initial, ridiculous attempt to charge him with a racially aggravated public order offence was abandoned, he was prosecuted instead under the Communications Act 2003, which makes it an offence to send over a public electronic communications network a message that is "grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character". Ahmed was found guilty last week and although he has not yet been sentenced he faces a possible six months in prison.

Even if we accept there was no hard evidence that the Infidels were inciting racial hatred – and Expose had no difficulty finding some examples at the time they were arrested – are the police really asking us to believe that none of the material posted on social networking sites by the Infidels was at least of an indecent, obscene or menacing character? Or perhaps the police think the Communications Act doesn't apply to the far right?



View the Original article