Showing posts with label backlash. Show all posts
Showing posts with label backlash. Show all posts

WBAI Radio: Boston Marathon bombings backlash

on Monday, April 22, 2013

An Interview with Malika Rushdan, ICNA Relief

 
Boston, MA (April 20, 2013) – As always some individuals and communities are being scape-goated and marginalized, most recently in the aftermath of the tragic Boston Marathon bombings.

To look at this, our guest Malika Rushdan MacDonald will be briefly discussing the impact of the recent bombings on the local Muslim and the wider immigrant communities of Boston. Malika is Project Director for Boston operations with Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA) Relief.
 
 




View the Original article

U.S. Muslims Mobilize To Prevent Backlash

on Thursday, April 18, 2013

 
By David Gibson and Lauren Markoe, 04/16/2013
 
(RNS) No sooner had the reality of the Boston Marathon bombing sunk in on Monday (April 15) afternoon than Muslim activists in the U.S. began sending out a slew of news releases, tweets and Facebook messages urging prayers and aid for the victims — and condemning whoever was behind the horrific attack.

“American Muslims, like Americans of all backgrounds, condemn in the strongest possible terms today’s cowardly bomb attack on participants and spectators of the Boston Marathon,” Nihad Awad, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said in a statement on Monday.

It’s a familiar race against time for Muslim groups. Almost as soon as the smoke cleared around Copley Square, they knew from long experience that some would immediately point the finger of blame in their direction.

Many widely believed Muslims were behind the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, until American militiaman Timothy McVeigh was convicted of the crime.

“We also call for the swift apprehension and punishment of the perpetrators,” Awad added, echoing a statement from the Muslim Public Affairs Council that called on “all of us as Americans to work together to bring those responsible to justice.”

Still, regular Fox News guest commentator Erik Rush quickly sent out tweets blaming Muslims, adding in one, “Let’s kill them,” a post he subsequently deleted. “Jihad in America,” wrote anti-Muslim blogger Pam Geller.

Speaking about the bombings on his ”700 Club” program, Pat Robertson was also furious: “Don’t talk to me about religion of peace” — the way Muslims describe their faith — “No way.”

On his show, conservative host Glenn Beck opined that “no American citizen blows up random people; that’s a Middle Eastern scene, that’s not an American scene. When our crazies go off, they target the government, not streets that are crowded with people.”

On Monday afternoon, the New York Post had to pull a story that reported that police had a Saudi suspect in custody. Later reports that a Saudi national’s apartment near Boston had been searched also raised anxieties among Muslims; the man, who was wounded in the bombing, was subsequently cleared.

“Discrimination against Muslims has been a real dynamic in the United States,” said Christina Warner, campaign director of Shoulder-to-Shoulder, a national interfaith alliance of Muslims, Jews and Christians who combat anti-Muslim prejudice. “We’ve already seen some reports falsely identifying the perpetrator as a Saudi individual when he was just a witness.”

“Obviously it’s a matter of concern,” said Naeem Baig, president of the Islamic Circle of North America, though he added that he has been impressed so far with the restraint shown by mainstream commentators.

“I see a very cautious and balanced approach from the media. It shows a lot of responsibility on their part, not jumping to conclusions,” he said.

“And the president and his statements were very balanced and mature,” Baig said. “Overall, politicians and the media have behaved responsibly.”

Yet if, in fact, Muslim extremists turn out to be associated in any way with the Boston bombing, then the fears in the Muslim community — and the efforts at damage control — will rise to a whole new level.

Already, Iowa congressman Steve King has drawn flack for suggesting that the possibility that a Saudi national was involved in the bombing would be reason enough to rethink immigration reform.

“If that’s the case, then we need to take a look at the big picture,” King, a Republican, told National Review Online. “If we can’t background-check people that are coming from Saudi Arabia, how do we think we are going to background check the 11 to 20 million people that are here from who knows where?”

On the flip side, members of King’s own party pushed back against that use of the Boston tragedy.

“We should really be very cautious about using language that links these two things in any way,” Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida told reporters on Tuesday. “We know very little about Boston other than that it was obviously an act of terror. We don’t know who carried it out or why they carried it out, and I would caution everyone to be very careful about linking the two.”

Article Courtesy: Huffington Post




View the Original article

Publisher's attack on Muslims provokes backlash from Australian Jewish community

on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

An article on illegal boat people by the publisher of Australia's main Jewish newspaper has ignited a storm of protest, with some critics savaging it for "vilifying Muslims" and promoting "xenophobic, Islamophobic and heartless sentiments."

Titled "Curb your compassion," Robert Magid's article published in last Friday's Sydney and Melbourne editions of the Australian Jewish News argued that illegal Muslim boat people are queue jumpers who deprive sanctuary to legitimate refugees.

"The Jews who fled the Holocaust fled certain death," he wrote. "I doubt whether there is a single boat person in that position. Some may have fled a war zone or limited economic opportunities while others are seeking an easy life."

Magid, a multimillionaire property developer who bought the newspaper in 2007, also accused illegal immigrants of "destination shopping" and suggested – despite the "collective memory of Jews' attempts to escape the Holocaust" – that Jews curb their compassion toward boat people.

He also linked asylum seekers to terrorism, suggesting that Muslim boat people could increase the risk of potential terror attacks. "If al-Qaida or another jihad organization wished to create a network of terrorists in Australia, undocumented illegal immigration would ensure the Australian authorities had no way of verifying their bona fides," he wrote.

The backlash to Magid's article exploded in the blogosphere, with the vast majority of comments blasting what David Zyngier, whose mother survived Auschwitz and arrived here with no papers in 1949, described as Magid's "anti-Jewish sentiments."

On Monday, an open letter initiated by the left-wing Australian Jewish Democratic Society accused Magid of engaging in "group vilification and dog whistle politics" against Muslims. The letter called for an apology "to all the victims of persecution who arrived by boat."

An online petition accrued more than 375 signatories as of Tuesday, along with a deluge of withering comments such as "anti-refugee sentiments have no place in my Jewish identity" and Magid used "fear, misinformation and biased language to vilify."

JTA, 7 August 2012



View the Original article